RE: POLL: GC options

2001-08-07 Thread Simon Marlow
> In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote: > > Issue 1: should the maximum heap size be unbounded by default? > > Currently the maximum heap size is bounded at 64M. > Arguments for: this > > stops programs with a space leak eating all your swap > space. Arguments > > against: it's annoying t

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-07 Thread Volker Stolz
In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote: > Issue 1: should the maximum heap size be unbounded by default? > Currently the maximum heap size is bounded at 64M. Arguments for: this > stops programs with a space leak eating all your swap space. Arguments > against: it's annoying to have to raise

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-07 Thread Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
Mon, 06 Aug 2001 15:40:50 -0700, Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pisze: > Regarding the maximum heap size, to avoid letting the heap grow too > large, you could perhaps take into account the number of page faults > that occur during garbage collection, or the ratio between CPU time and > r

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Mike Thomas
Hi Simon. > Issue 1: should the maximum heap size be unbounded by default? > Currently the maximum heap size is bounded at 64M. Arguments for: this > stops programs with a space leak eating all your swap space. Arguments > against: it's annoying to have to raise the limit when you legitimately

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Thomas Hallgren
Simon Marlow wrote: >Folks, > >There is some disagreement over how the GC options should be specified >for Haskell programs. > Something that I think would be very convenient, help alleviate some of the problems discussed, and still very easy to implement, would be support for setting run-time

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Dylan Thurston
On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 12:22:07PM +0100, Simon Marlow wrote: > > I think that if there should be a default limit it would be nice to be > > able to set it at compile time. This is something that I've wanted for > > quite some time. If I know that the program I am compiling is > > likely to > > n

RE: POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Simon Marlow
> On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Simon Marlow wrote: > > > Issue 1: should the maximum heap size be unbounded by default? > > Currently the maximum heap size is bounded at 64M. > Arguments for: this > > stops programs with a space leak eating all your swap > space. Arguments > > against: it's annoying

Re: POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Josef Svenningsson
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Simon Marlow wrote: > Issue 1: should the maximum heap size be unbounded by default? > Currently the maximum heap size is bounded at 64M. Arguments for: this > stops programs with a space leak eating all your swap space. Arguments > against: it's annoying to have to raise th

POLL: GC options

2001-08-06 Thread Simon Marlow
Folks, There is some disagreement over how the GC options should be specified for Haskell programs. I've identified a couple of issues below, comments and opinions are greatly appreciated. If there's a concensus that things should be changed, then I'll make the changes for the next release. Is