On Thu, 10 Jul 2003, Volker Stolz wrote:
In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote:
I use the Posix library since I have to communicate via a pipe with
another UNIX process.
Therefore I have to use
fdRead :: Fd - ByteCount - IO (String,ByteCount)
Why do you have to use an Fd?
A
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Volker Stolz wrote:
createPipe :: IO (Fd,Fd) (Unkown alternatives)
I suppose you have to pass this descriptor to another process
through fork()?
Rigth.
(piper,pipew) - createPipe
mpid - forkProcess
case mpid of
Nothing - do --child
nobytes - fdWrite
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:39:54AM +0200, Rafael Martinez Torres wrote:
(piper,pipew) - createPipe
piperHandle - fdToHandle(piper)
threadWaitRead ( fdToInt(handleToFd(piperHandle)) )
message - hGetLine piperHandle --or whatever.
There's no need to call threadWaitRead, Haskell's RTS will take
I use the Posix library since I have to communicate via a pipe with
another UNIX process.
Therefore I have to use
fdRead :: Fd - ByteCount - IO (String,ByteCount)
The problem is that fdRead , as a non Haskell-IO sub-system function,
seems
to block the entire STG system. The rest of the other
In local.glasgow-haskell-users, you wrote:
I use the Posix library since I have to communicate via a pipe with
another UNIX process.
Therefore I have to use
fdRead :: Fd - ByteCount - IO (String,ByteCount)
Why do you have to use an Fd? A regular handle should be sufficient.
Where do you get
