| Making it possible to use Haskell in mixed language projects with C++
| and Java is obviously a good thing, but it's not really a scalable
| solution to distribute them all together. We should look at how to
| improve cabal+ghc to make it easier to use them as a component of a
| larger system.
On Sun, 2007-04-29 at 10:38 +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Hello Albert,
Sunday, April 29, 2007, 2:51:24 AM, you wrote:
Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a
C++ compiler?
.NET literates, will benefit from the many libraries available in .NET.
Can
Hi
Is it just me who thinks this is a silly idea? Why should GHC include a
alternative way may be inclusion of instructions how to add c++ compiler
to ghc installation - it's not trivial because one need to know which
gcc version should be used and which files copied
Since I know that Bulat
Hello Bulat,
I think that builders/distributers use make binary-dist to
make binary distribution normally.
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/wiki/Building/Using#BootstrappingGHC
make binary-dist calls prep-bin-dist-mingw to make Windows friendly
distribution now.
