Hello John,
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
Thursday, September 28, 2006, 3:30:09 AM, you wrote:
So, just to confirm in my mind what you are proposing:
Compiler/Version specific Core:
Yhc.Core, Hugs.Core, GHC.Core
With a
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
I don't see how compiler-independence is a GHC-specific topic.
___
Glasgow-haskell-users
Hello Ross,
Tuesday, October 3, 2006, 10:33:46 PM, you wrote:
On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 06:06:02PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
(i'm moving thread to the ghc-users where this discussion continues in
ghc-related aspects)
I don't see how compiler-independence is a GHC-specific topic.
i mean
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 05:20:36PM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
As it happens I was working on getting GHC to use cabal to build base
et al on the plane the other day, and I had a brief look at this.
See my comment in
http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/710
for the results of my longer
Hello Neil,
Thursday, September 14, 2006, 6:14:30 PM, you wrote:
then, a base library may be written against virtual Haskell compiler,
which provides uniform set of low-level features while 'base' decorates
these features with user-friendly interfaces
Nice idea. There are a few practical
Hello Ian,
Friday, September 15, 2006, 8:20:36 PM, you wrote:
what is a 'base' library now? it is the library that implements common set
of operations for latest versions of ghc, hugs and nhc. it contains
low-level implementation for ghc, but relies on separate hugsbase
package for hugs (the
Hi Bulat,
Just a partial answer for now:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 12:29:58PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
Friday, September 8, 2006, 5:52:57 AM, you wrote:
what is a 'base' library now? it is the library that implements common set
of operations for latest versions of ghc, hugs and nhc.
(i crosspost my letter into main haskell list because i hope that
proposed solution is of great interest for (discussion with) many
developers)
Hello Ian,
Friday, September 8, 2006, 5:52:57 AM, you wrote:
and last question - i don't like inclusion of unix and win32 in a list
of core libs.
