RE: optimization that doesn't make recompilation be needed more often?

2007-05-21 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
reduce them back to the -Onot level. Simon | -Original Message- | From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On | Behalf Of Isaac Dupree | Sent: 18 May 2007 22:51 | To: GHC Users | Subject: optimization that doesn't make recompilation be needed more often? | | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED

optimization that doesn't make recompilation be needed more often?

2007-05-18 Thread Isaac Dupree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Could there be a flag weaker than -O that doesn't cause recompilation any more than -O0 does -- would that provide any worthwhile optimizations? (an intermediate speed-tradeoff option for haskell developers.) Dependency on the details of modules

Re: optimization that doesn't make recompilation be needed more often?

2007-05-18 Thread John Meacham
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 05:51:12PM -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: Could there be a flag weaker than -O that doesn't cause recompilation any more than -O0 does -- would that provide any worthwhile optimizations? (an intermediate speed-tradeoff option for haskell developers.) Dependency on the