RE: behaviour of {-# NOINLINE #-} in where clauses

2006-08-14 Thread Simon Peyton-Jones
[Narrowing to ghc users only] That's odd. I tried it (the HEAD) and it worked fine. Input and output below You'll notice that the binding for 'realloc' got floated into the branch of the case (that's FloatIn), but it is never inlined. | Even so, I kind of wish there were a stage between STG

Re: [Haskell] Haskell Workshop 2006 Call for participation

2006-08-14 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Monday, August 14, 2006, 10:34:22 AM, Andres Loeh wrote: 14:30 Simon Marlow (Microsoft Research) An Extensible Dynamically-Typed Hierarchy of Exceptions is this planned to be included in ghc 6.6? 6.8? 15:00 David Himmelstrup (Denmark) Demo: Interactive Debugging with

Re: behaviour of {-# NOINLINE #-} in where clauses

2006-08-14 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello Duncan, Monday, August 14, 2006, 2:33:31 AM, you wrote: Reversing the test doesn't help because either way ghc turns it into: case thing of _DEFAULT - 4096 - to be exact, ghc passes code for default case separately from code for other cases. look at emitSwitch procedure to know

Re[8]: Replacement for GMP: Update

2006-08-14 Thread Bulat Ziganshin
Hello skaller, Sunday, August 13, 2006, 4:34:14 AM, you wrote: I know very little about Haskell, let alone GHC internals me too. so it's better to wait for comments about your thoughts from GHC team than from me. but at least i can said that But the state of the art is then two stages behind

RE: behaviour of {-# NOINLINE #-} in where clauses

2006-08-14 Thread Duncan Coutts
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 10:12 +0100, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: [Narrowing to ghc users only] That's odd. I tried it (the HEAD) and it worked fine. Input and output below You'll notice that the binding for 'realloc' got floated into the branch of the case (that's FloatIn), but it is never