Re: more extra-libs for ghc 6.6

2006-09-27 Thread Simon Marlow

Bulat Ziganshin wrote:


how about adding to the list of extra libs the following very useful ones:

regex-*
FilePath
MissingH
Edison


Let me echo what Ian said: the idea with extralibs was not to bundle useful 
stuff with GHC, but rather to *separate* from GHC as many of the bundled 
libraries as we can.  In the future we will probably drop extralibs altogether - 
it's only purpose is to reduce the surprise level for people used to all the 
bundled libs in GHC 6.4.2.


Cheers,
Simon
___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: more extra-libs for ghc 6.6

2006-09-25 Thread Ian Lynagh
On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 08:45:30PM +0400, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
 Hello glasgow-haskell-users,
 
 how about adding to the list of extra libs the following very useful ones:

I think we're too late in the release process to be adding libraries.
Also, I think we would like to move towards distributing fewer
libraries, not more.

For 6.8 I hope we can do something like drop the extra-libs tarball, but
have the build process do a topological sort of everything in libraries/
and build the lot. That way if you want to bundle a given set of libs in
the Windows installer, or whatever, then you just instruct cabal-get to
give you the source tarballs for those libs, and anything they depend
on (would need to tell it you have the core libraries already somehow),
put them in libraries/ and build in the normal way.

This would neatly sidestep any arguments about what packages are
important/common/small/... enough that they should go in extralibs.

 regex-*

I'm not sure if you are refering to other packages, but
regex-base, regex-compat and regex-posix are already core libraries.


Thanks
Ian

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


Re: more extra-libs for ghc 6.6

2006-09-19 Thread Neil Mitchell

Hi,

While I'd dearly love for FilePath to go in, the API is not quite
stable enough yet - I have another few API changes that I need to make
before I send out another version that is suitable for inclusion to
base, so i'd like to make those changes first, have another round of
review etc. then go into extra-libs.

(Just to be clear, there will be a compatability layer between
FilePath new and FilePath old so existing app's based on FilePath are
not just going to get broken overnight :) )

Thanks

Neil


On 9/19/06, Bulat Ziganshin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hello glasgow-haskell-users,

how about adding to the list of extra libs the following very useful ones:

regex-*
FilePath
MissingH
Edison

?

--
Best regards,
 Bulat  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users


___
Glasgow-haskell-users mailing list
Glasgow-haskell-users@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/glasgow-haskell-users