Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Raghavendra G
+gluster-users On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:46 AM, Raghavendra G wrote: > Replying to all queries here: > > * Is it a bug or performance enhancement? > Its a performance enhancement. No functionality is broken if this patch > is not taken in. > > * Are there performance

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Raghavendra G
Replying to all queries here: * Is it a bug or performance enhancement? Its a performance enhancement. No functionality is broken if this patch is not taken in. * Are there performance numbers to validate the claim? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358606#c9 * Are there any

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

2017-05-28 Thread jenkins
[...truncated 6 lines...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1455912 / core: [Brick Multiplexing] heal info shows the status of the bricks as "Transport endpoint is not connected" though bricks are up https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1450567 / core: brick process cannot be started at the first time

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Shyam
On 05/28/2017 09:24 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Niels de Vos > wrote: On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:25:42PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > Or this one: https://review.gluster.org/15036

Re: [Gluster-devel] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Shyam
On 05/28/2017 04:18 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:25:42PM -0400, Shyam wrote: Or this one: https://review.gluster.org/15036 This is backported to 3.8/10 and 3.11 and considering the size and impact of the change, I wanted to be sure that we are going to accept this across

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:25:42PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > > Or this one: https://review.gluster.org/15036 > > > > This is backported to 3.8/10 and 3.11 and considering the size and > impact of > > the change, I wanted to be

Re: [Gluster-devel] Backport for "Add back socket for polling of events immediately..."

2017-05-28 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:25:42PM -0400, Shyam wrote: > Or this one: https://review.gluster.org/15036 > > This is backported to 3.8/10 and 3.11 and considering the size and impact of > the change, I wanted to be sure that we are going to accept this across all > 3 releases? > > @Du, would like

[Gluster-devel] Webpage for pointing to projects that have Gluster integrations

2017-05-28 Thread Niels de Vos
Hi Amye, You have mentioned a couple of times that a new website is being planned/developed. Is there a list of tasks that have been identified and need to be worked on? I would like to see if there is a page planned for listing projects that have integrations with Gluster. If no such task is

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Fwd: Re: GlusterFS removal from Openstack Cinder

2017-05-28 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 08:48:00PM -0400, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 3:02 AM, Joe Julian wrote: > > > On 05/26/2017 11:38 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Joe Julian wrote: > > >