On Tuesday 24 June 2014 08:17 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
Does anyone know why inode_unref is no-op for root inode?
I see the following code in inode.c
static inode_t *
__inode_unref (inode_t *inode)
{
if (!inode)
return NULL;
if (__is_root_gfid(ino
Jeff,
- Original Message -
> > Am I right if I understood that the value for media-type is not
> > interpreted beyond the scope of matching rules? That is to say, we
> > don't need/have any notion of media-types that type check internally
> > for forming (sub)volumes using the rules specif
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
> On 24/06/2014, at 6:34 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Since there has been traction for ports of GlusterFS to other unix
> distributions, we thought of adding maintainers for the various ports that
> are around. I am glad to ann
On 23/05/2014, at 6:52 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
>> Do you reckon we should get that Mac Mini in the Westford
>> lab set up to automatically test Gluster builds each
>> night or something?
>>
>> If so, we should probably take/claim ownership of it,
>> upgrade the memory in it, and (possibly) see
- Original Message -
> From: "Anders Blomdell"
> To: "Niels de Vos"
> Cc: "Shyamsundar Ranganathan" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Susant Palai"
>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 4:09:52 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] 3.5.1-beta2 Problems with suid and sgid bits on
> directories
>
> -
On 24/06/2014, at 6:34 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Since there has been traction for ports of GlusterFS to other unix
> distributions, we thought of adding maintainers for the various ports that
> are around. I am glad to announce that the following individuals who have
> been chuggin
Hi All,
Since there has been traction for ports of GlusterFS to other unix
distributions, we thought of adding maintainers for the various ports
that are around. I am glad to announce that the following individuals
who have been chugging GlusterFS along on those distributions have
readily agr
> Its possible to express your example using lists if their entries are allowed
> to overlap. I see that you wanted a way to express a matrix (overlapping
> rules) with gluster's tree-like syntax as backdrop.
>
> A polytree may be a better term than matrix (DAG without cycles), i.e. when
> there a
Does anyone know why inode_unref is no-op for root inode?
I see the following code in inode.c
static inode_t *
__inode_unref (inode_t *inode)
{
if (!inode)
return NULL;
if (__is_root_gfid(inode->gfid))
return inode;
...
}
Pranith
Its possible to express your example using lists if their entries are allowed
to overlap. I see that you wanted a way to express a matrix (overlapping rules)
with gluster's tree-like syntax as backdrop.
A polytree may be a better term than matrix (DAG without cycles), i.e. when
there are over
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 04:45:30PM +0530, Chandrahasa S wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am building Glusterfs on shared storage.
>
> I got Disk array with 2 SAS controller, one controller connected to node A
> and other Node B.
>
> Can I create Glusterfs between these two node ( A & B) without
> repl
Dear All,
I am building Glusterfs on shared storage.
I got Disk array with 2 SAS controller, one controller connected to node A
and other Node B.
Can I create Glusterfs between these two node ( A & B) without
replication, but data should be read / write on both node ( for better
performance).
Dear All,
I am building Glusterfs on shared storage.
I got Disk array with 2 SAS controller, one controller connected to node A
and other Node B.
Can I create Glusterfs between these two node ( A & B) without
replication, but data should be read / write on both node ( for better
performance).
SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.1.tar.gz
This release is made off jenkins-release-73
-- Gluster Build System
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/
Hi Jeff,
This is regarding the patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/3842/ (epoll:
edge triggered and multi-threaded epoll).
The testcase './tests/bugs/bug-873367.t' hangs with this fix (Please
find the stack trace below).
In the code snippet below we found that 'SSL_pending' was returning 0.
I
Kudos to the folks behind this release !
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:15:58AM -0700, Gluster Build System wrote:
> >
> >
> > SRC:
> http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.1.tar.gz
> >
> > This release is made off jen
Hi Jeff,
Missed to add this:
SSL_pending was 0 before calling SSL_readand hence SSL_get_errorreturned
'SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ'
Thanks,
Vijay
On Tuesday 24 June 2014 05:15 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
Hi Jeff,
This is regarding the patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/3842/
(epoll: edge triggered a
> Am I right if I understood that the value for media-type is not
> interpreted beyond the scope of matching rules? That is to say, we
> don't need/have any notion of media-types that type check internally
> for forming (sub)volumes using the rules specified.
Exactly. To us it's just an opaque ID
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 03:15:58AM -0700, Gluster Build System wrote:
>
>
> SRC: http://bits.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/src/glusterfs-3.5.1.tar.gz
>
> This release is made off jenkins-release-73
Many thanks to everyone how tested the glusterfs-3.5.1 beta releases and
gave feedback. Ther
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-06-23 12:03, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:49:26AM -0400, Shyamsundar Ranganathan wrote:
>> You maybe looking at the problem being fixed here, [1].
>>
>> On a lookup attribute mismatch was not being healed across
>> directori
Jeff,
I have a few questions regarding the rules syntax and how they apply.
I think this is different in spirit from the discussion Dan has started
and keeping it separate. See questions inline.
- Original Message -
> One of the things holding up our data classification efforts (which inc
21 matches
Mail list logo
