[Gluster-devel] Gerrit review UI documentation

2015-04-24 Thread Ravishankar N
Thought this might be helpful if you want to explore the features of the new gerrit review interface: https://review.gluster.org/Documentation/user-review-ui.html -Ravi ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org

Re: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review UI documentation

2015-04-24 Thread Susant Palai
Thanks Ravi. Very helpful. - Original Message - From: Ravishankar N ravishan...@redhat.com To: Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 2:00:52 PM Subject: [Gluster-devel] Gerrit review UI documentation Thought this might be helpful if you want to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core by test case : georep-tarssh-hybrid.t

2015-04-24 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 04/24/2015 10:53 AM, Venky Shankar wrote: On 04/24/2015 10:22 AM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: Hi Atin, It is not spurious, there is an issue with this pointer I think. All changelog consumers such as bitrot, geo-rep would see this. Since it's a race, it occurred with gsyncd.

Re: [Gluster-devel] Upcall state + Data Tiering

2015-04-24 Thread Shyam
Please see this thread on the same/similar problem, http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2014-December/043284.html This was discussed particularly for lease locks (when that feature was being discussed, and for tier as that would move files more frequently). The solution outline is

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core by test case : georep-tarssh-hybrid.t

2015-04-24 Thread Susant Palai
Appended comments inline. - Original Message - From: Susant Palai spa...@redhat.com To: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Friday, April 24, 2015 7:17:33 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Core by test case : georep-tarssh-hybrid.t

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core by test case : georep-tarssh-hybrid.t

2015-04-24 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Hi, I think the following patch fixes the gsyncd core. http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10366/ The regression has also caught two other racy bugs one in dht and race between dict_get_bin and dic_set_bin. Susant and Anuradha will be sending the fixes for them respectively. Should we wait for these

[Gluster-devel] Regarding the Porting of messages from gf_log to gf_msg

2015-04-24 Thread Anusha Rao
I had a few doubts regarding the conversion from gf_log to gf_msg: 1) Is it necessary to convert all gf_log messages to gf_msg ? 2) If (1) is yes, then should all the INFO and other messages have msg_id (If it is not related to the Admins) ? Since msg_id argument in the gf_msg is one of the

[Gluster-devel] New spurious failures in NetBSD regression

2015-04-24 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Hi I noticed two new spurious failures in NetBSD regression, with weighted-rebalance.t and glupy.t. I took two VM offline and ran the tests in a loop, but I cannot reproduce the problems. I had 52 success in a row for weighted-rebalance.t and 1190 for glupy.t (which is obviously faster to

Re: [Gluster-devel] New spurious failures in NetBSD regression

2015-04-24 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 04/25/2015 07:30 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: Hi I noticed two new spurious failures in NetBSD regression, with weighted-rebalance.t and glupy.t. I took two VM offline and ran the tests in a loop, but I cannot reproduce the problems. I had 52 success in a row for weighted-rebalance.t and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Regarding the Porting of messages from gf_log to gf_msg

2015-04-24 Thread Shyam
On 04/24/2015 11:06 AM, Anusha Rao wrote: I had a few doubts regarding the conversion from gf_log to gf_msg: 1) Is it necessary to convert all gf_log messages to gf_msg ? Yes, once we get to the point that gf_log is not used anywhere, we should be retiring that interface. 2) If (1) is