Hey Atin (and the wider community),
This looks interesting, though I have a couple questions:
1. Language choice - Why the divergence from Python (which I'm no fan of) which
is already heavily used in GlusterFS? It seems a bit strange to me to
introduce yet another language into the GlusterFS
As an upstream admin, one of the things I abhor about debian/ubuntu is how
services are enabled upon installation. I sure hope Fedora/EL doesn't follow
their broken example.
Can we enable the static firewall rule in glusterd.service?
On September 4, 2015 6:37:15 AM PDT, Christopher Blum wrot
Wasn't the idea behind this all that we have the necessary firewall rules
active by default? Why would an admin install Gluster, but NOT allow it to
work?
Do you know if we will have the service pre-enabled after the install of
RHGS3.1.1?
Christopher Blum
Associate Storage Consultant
Global Storag
Thanks Avra! will do the appropriate change.
- Original Message -
From: "Avra Sengupta"
To: "Joseph Fernandes"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 5:45:19 PM
Subject: Re: Snapshot test Spurious Failure
It's not a spurious failure. In the patch
http://review.gluster.org
It's not a spurious failure. In the patch
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12031/3, you are using list_for_each_entry
in clear_bricklist(), and deleting an item from the list. That is not a
right practice. Instead you should use list_for_each_entry_safe.
Regards,
Avra
On 09/04/2015 11:50 AM, Av
On 09/04/2015 05:20 PM, Christopher Blum wrote:
Where do you add the services to the zone? I couldn't find that in
your code...
By default it is not attached to any zone, admin has to enable
glusterfs-static service to his/her active zone after installation.
Christopher Blum
Associate St
Where do you add the services to the zone? I couldn't find that in your
code...
Christopher Blum
Associate Storage Consultant
Global Storage Consulting, Red Hat
+49 711 96 43 7009
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Anand Nekkunti wrote:
> see comments below
>
>
> On 09/01/2015 02:47 PM, Anand Nek
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Prashanth Pai wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> > Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org
> > Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:43:09 PM
> > Subject: [Gluster-devel] [posix-compliance] unlink and ac
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra G"
To: "Shyam"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Thursday, 2 July, 2015 10:21:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Lock migration as a part of rebalance
One solution I can think of is to have the responsibility of lock migration
process spread
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of GlusterFS-3.7.4. This release
includes 92 changes after 3.7.3. The list of fixed bugs is included
below.
Tarball and RPMs can be downloaded from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/3.7/3.7.4/
Ubuntu debs are available from
https://laun
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Cc: gluster-us...@gluster.org
> Sent: Friday, September 4, 2015 12:43:09 PM
> Subject: [Gluster-devel] [posix-compliance] unlink and access to file through
> open fd
>
> All,
>
> Posix allows access t
On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> On 09/04/2015 12:43 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> Posix allows access to file through open fds even if name associated with
>> file is deleted. While this works for glusterfs for most of the cases,
>> there are some corne
On 09/04/2015 12:43 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
All,
Posix allows access to file through open fds even if name associated with file
is deleted. While this works for glusterfs for most of the cases, there are
some corner cases where we fail.
1. Reboot of brick:
===
With th
Jeff and Manu already did review of http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12093/.
Would like a few more reviews before I merge this.
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://www.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel
> Maintainers - can you please take stock of this and ensure sanity of your
> components before merging patches that do not fix a failing test?
>
>
Here is my proposal to get this fixed.
This weekend, 5th September 0400 UTC, I will start a jenkins run on master
and 3.7 branches.
- It will be
All,
Posix allows access to file through open fds even if name associated with file
is deleted. While this works for glusterfs for most of the cases, there are
some corner cases where we fail.
1. Reboot of brick:
===
With the reboot of brick, fd is lost. unlink would've deleted
16 matches
Mail list logo
