Test number 82 is a umount operation on NFS mount, not sure why umount
failed.
EXPECT_WITHIN $UMOUNT_TIMEOUT "Y" force_umount $N0
Thanks,
Vijay
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see the below test failing for an unrelated patch:
On 03/09/2016 10:40 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve
subdirectory-mount support with access-controls
regards
Aravinda
On 03/08/2016 07:32 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
hi,
Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve
subdirectory-mount support with access-controls
(http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-March/048537.html).
What follows here is a short
Awesome idea!
Now Geo-rep can be used to take daily/monthly backup. With Gluster
3.7.9, we can run Geo-replication whenever required instead of running
all the time.
http://review.gluster.org/13510 (geo-rep: Script to Schedule
Geo-replication)
Full Backup:
1. Create Geo-rep
Sorry for the delay in responding. I am looking at this core. Will
update with my findings/patches.
Pranith
On 03/08/2016 12:29 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
Hi All,
The regression run has caused the core to generate for below patch.
Hi Poornima,
On 03/07/2016 11:24 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
Hi All,
Here is the link to feature page: http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11980/
Patches can be found @:
hi,
Late last week I sent a solution for how to achieve
subdirectory-mount support with access-controls
(http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2016-March/048537.html).
What follows here is a short description of how other features of
gluster volumes are implemented for
- Original Message -
> From: "Niels de Vos"
> To: "Krutika Dhananjay" , "Vijay Bellur"
>
> Cc: "Dan Lambright" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Pranith Karampuri"
>
On 03/05/2016 03:45 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
In order to estimate GlusterFS arbiter brick size, I've deployed test setup
with replica 3 arbiter 1 volume within one node. Each brick is located on
separate HDD (XFS with inode size == 512). Using GlusterFS v3.7.6 + memleak
patches. Volume
I did talk to the author and he is going to look into the issue.
3.7.9 is round the corner and we certainly don't want bad tests to block
patches that need to go in.
-Krutika
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Dan Lambright wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From:
- Original Message -
> From: "Krutika Dhananjay"
> To: "Pranith Karampuri"
> Cc: "gluster-infra" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "RHGS tiering mailing
> list" , "Dan
Hi All,
Following are the meeting minutes for today Gluster community bug triaging
meeting.
Meeting ended Tue Mar 8 12:58:43 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
Minutes:
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
(https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
(in
Hi Raghavendra,
Can we have this documented (with a example workflow) here:
http://gluster.readthedocs.org/en/latest/Developer-guide/Development-Workflow/
Thanks,
Saravana
On 03/07/2016 10:57 AM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Raghavendra Talur
Hi Milind,
These are the two tests that failed in NetBSD:
TEST $CLI volume stop $V0;
EXPECT "1" get_aux
We are not sure why the volume stop has failed. Since the
volume stop is failed, it is obvious that the next test case
would fail. Could you please retrigger and check?
--
Thanks & Regards,
Hi Milind,
There was an issue with this test case caused by a parallel cherry-pick.
More info [1].
It is already fixed, and rebasing your patch will work.
[1] :
http://nongnu.13855.n7.nabble.com/mainline-regression-test-is-broken-td209079.html
Regards!
Rafi
On 03/08/2016 01:56 PM, Mohammed
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/14776/
==
Running tests in file ./tests/basic/quota.t
[06:08:03] ./tests/basic/quota.t ..
not ok 75
not ok 76
Failed 2/76 subtests
[06:08:03]
Test Summary Report
oops! how did I miss that :)
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/18683/
--
Milind
- Original Message -
From: "Mohammed Rafi K C"
To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" , "Milind Changire"
Cc:
HI Du,
I will take a look.
Milind,
Can you please provide a link for the failed case.
Rafi
On 03/08/2016 12:59 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> +rafi.
>
> Rafi, can you have an initial analysis on this?
>
> regards,
> Raghavendra.
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Milind Changire"
19 matches
Mail list logo