[Gluster-devel] Reminder: adding source files

If you add a file to the project, please remember to add it to the appropriate Makefile.am as well. Failure to do so *will not show up* in our standard smoke/regression tests because those do "make install" but they will prevent RPMs (and probably equivalents on other distros/platforms) from

[Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature: 01-04-2016

Hi all, This week's status: -Tested the program with different volume configurations -Exploring on the gluster test framework -Writing regression test for the feature Plan for next week: -Completing the regression test -Handling the issue with the smoke regression Current work: POC:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

- Original Message - From: "Prasanna Kalever" To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" Cc: "Joseph Fernandes" , "Raghavendra Talur" , "Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna" , "gluster-devel"

Re: [Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > Hi all, > > As I am trying to write a test for the WORM translator > which I am working on right now, I am facing some issues > while executing the test framework. > I followed the steps in >

[Gluster-devel] Requesting for help with gluster test framework

Hi all, As I am trying to write a test for the WORM translator which I am working on right now, I am facing some issues while executing the test framework. I followed the steps in https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/master/tests/README.md [Issue #1] While running the run-tests.sh ...

Re: [Gluster-devel] "Samba and NFS-Ganesha support for tiered volumes" is at risk for 3.8

- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" > To: "Dan Lambright" , "Joseph Fernandes" > > Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org > Sent: Friday, April 1, 2016 4:09:11 AM > Subject: "Samba and NFS-Ganesha support for tiered volumes"

Re: [Gluster-devel] Stop merging changes - Not all smoke tests are reporting status to gerrit

The reporting has been fixed now. Jenkins will be reporting back the results of the following smoke jobs, - smoke (linux smoke) - netbsd6-smoke - freebsd-smoke - gluster-devrpms (rpms on fedora) - gluster-devrpms-el6 - gluster-devrpms-el7 - compare-bug-version-and-git-branch As an additional

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick is Offline

On 04/01/2016 02:55 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Hi Atin, > > Thanks for reply. > > Could you please help me to identify the error log in the respective > brick log file. I tried but not able to identified where the problem is > occuring. > > I am attaching the brick log file which is not

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick is Offline

Hi Atin, Thanks for reply. Could you please help me to identify the error log in the respective brick log file. I tried but not able to identified where the problem is occuring. I am attaching the brick log file which is not coming online even after waiting for 1 minute. Regards, Abhishek On

[Gluster-devel] HELP! Many features on the 3.8 roadmap are missing basic details

Hi, You might have seen that we have moved some features to a new "at risk" category on the 3.8 roadmap. These are the features that did not provide any details for the feature page yet. However, many other features do not provide basic details like a summary, link to bugs or patches, and so on.

[Gluster-devel] "Samba and NFS-Ganesha support for tiered volumes" is at risk for 3.8

Hi, the feature labelled "Samba and NFS-Ganesha support for tiered volumes" did not receive any status updates by pull request to the 3.8 roadmap. We have now moved this feature to the new "at risk" category on the page. If there is still an intention to include this feature with 3.8, we

[Gluster-devel] "Tiering Performance Enhancements" is at risk for 3.8

Hi, the feature labelled "Tiering Performance Enhancements" did not receive any status updates by pull request to the 3.8 roadmap. We have now moved this feature to the new "at risk" category on the page. If there is still an intention to include this feature with 3.8, we encourage you send an

[Gluster-devel] "Converged HA for NFS-Ganesha and Samba" is at risk for 3.8

Hi, the feature labelled "Converged HA for NFS-Ganesha and Samba" did not receive any status updates by pull request to the 3.8 roadmap. We have now moved this feature to the new "at risk" category on the page. If there is still an intention to include this feature with 3.8, we encourage you send

[Gluster-devel] "Quota Enhancements" is at risk for 3.8

Hi, the feature labelled "Quota Enhancements" did not receive any status updates by pull request to the 3.8 roadmap. We have now moved this feature to the new "at risk" category on the page. If there is still an intention to include this feature with 3.8, we encourage you send an update for the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Brick is Offline

On 04/01/2016 12:10 PM, ABHISHEK PALIWAL wrote: > Hi, > > > I have the setup of two boards A and B with two bricks in replica mode. > > There is one test scenario > > 1. A acts as an active board and having the glusterfs mount point on it. > 2. B acts as Passive board. > 3. We are

[Gluster-devel] Stop merging changes - Not all smoke tests are reporting status to gerrit

Hi All, There has been a recent change which has caused failures to build RPMs. This change was also unknowingly backported to release-3.7, because the failures were not reported back to gerrit. Rpmbuild results aren't being reported back to gerrit since we brought in the new flags for voting.

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Update on 3.7.10 - on schedule to be tagged at 2200PDT 30th March.

In the time I was waiting for https://review.gluster.org/13861/ , a change was merged in (which I didn't know of) and has broken building RPMs. The offending change is 3d34c49 (cluster/ec: Rebalance hangs during rename) by Ashish. The same change had earlier also broken building RPMs on master.

[Gluster-devel] Brick is Offline

Hi, I have the setup of two boards A and B with two bricks in replica mode. There is one test scenario 1. A acts as an active board and having the glusterfs mount point on it. 2. B acts as Passive board. 3. We are repetitively rebooting the B board (In this time period peer status on A board

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] glusterfs ctdb issues

Daniel, If filetransfer being interrupted is the only problem, then that is expected. This is because the IP failover happens to a different node but the open file descriptor is not transferred, to the node the IP is failed over to. Hence, the IP failover feature provides a way of not having to