Sanoj Unnikrishnan wrote:
> > But running the test framework hits the bug reliabily?
> yes!
`
Did you try running with test framework and attaching the offending
process using gdb?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
+1 for "no-rewinddir-support" option in DHT.
We are seeing very slow directory listing specially with 1500+ brick
volume, 'ls' takes 20+ second with 1000+ files.
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 7:08 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Keiviw"
>> To: gluster-devel@
Tested Bitrot related aspects. Created data, enabled bitrot and created
more data. The files were signed by the bitrot daemon. Simulated the
corruption by editing a file directly in the backend.
Triggered scrubbing (on demand). Found that the corrupted files were marked
bad by the scrubber.
Also r
yes!
I checked some of the newer logs now, looks like the console message may be
delayed in earlier console logs.
I would have to check the TC prior to quota-rename.t as well
(./tests/basic/quota-nfs.t ).
Thanks and Regards,
Sanoj
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Sanoj
Sanoj Unnikrishnan wrote:
> Ran the same steps as in the quota-rename.t (manually though. multiple
> times!), Could not reproduce the issue.
But running the test framework hits the bug reliabily?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
__
On 2016-11-04 at 11:27 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 03 novembre 2016 à 19:04 +0100, Michael Adam a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > recently a new repo was created under the github/gluster org:
> >
> > github.com/gluster/container-storage
> >
> > This is supposed to become the home of glu
Le jeudi 03 novembre 2016 à 19:04 +0100, Michael Adam a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> recently a new repo was created under the github/gluster org:
>
> github.com/gluster/container-storage
>
> This is supposed to become the home of gluster's container
> storage project. This is the project which brings
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Xavier Hernandez
wrote:
> Hi Soumya,
>
>
> On 21/10/16 16:15, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 10/21/2016 06:35 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Xavi,
>>>
>>> On 10/21/2016 12:57 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
>>>
Looking at the code, I think that the added
