Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

> [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/dump-tmpl.c] -> > [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/dump-tmpl.c]: (error) syntax error > [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/recon-tmpl.c] -> > [xlators/experimental/fdl/src/recon-tmpl.c]: (error) syntax error > [xlators/experimental/jbr-client/src/fop-template.c] -> >

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On 12/19/2016 01:06 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: >> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? >> >> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of >> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make >> it >> vote after 1

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? > > The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of > them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make > it > vote after 1 month. I guss the cli and experimental xlator (and

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > > Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? > > > > The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of > > them in the next 1 month, I

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On 12/19/2016 12:56 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: > On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: >> Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? >> >> The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of >> them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

On 12/19/2016 12:49 PM, Nigel Babu wrote: > Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? > > The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of > them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it > vote after 1 month. I

Re: [Gluster-devel] static analysis updated

Thank you Kaleb. Shall we start somwhere in terms of automation? The cppcheck results look the shortest[1]. If we can commit to fixing all of them in the next 1 month, I can kick off a non-voting smoke job. We'll make it vote after 1 month. I guss the cli and experimental xlator (and a few more

Re: [Gluster-devel] syncop_getxattr stuck

Raghavendra, Thanks for explaining this. I moved the call from callback to FOP and that seems to have resolved the issue. Thanks and Regards, Ram -Original Message- From: Raghavendra Gowdappa [mailto:rgowd...@redhat.com] Sent: Sunday, December 18, 2016

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10: Feature page status (and call for reviews)

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Shyam wrote: > A) We need reviewers/maintainers to complete the reviews of the feature > pages that are under review, and get them to an accepted state. > > B) We need the missing feature pages added, so that those can go through > the

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.10: Feature page status (and call for reviews)

A) We need reviewers/maintainers to complete the reviews of the feature pages that are under review, and get them to an accepted state. B) We need the missing feature pages added, so that those can go through the required reviews. Just a reminder on the timelines, we have branching set to:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Release 3.10 feature proposal : Gluster Block Storage CLI Integration

On 12/14/2016 01:38 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:40:53PM +0530, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote: On 16-12-14 07:43:05, Niels de Vos wrote: On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 11:28:52AM +0530, Prasanna Kalever wrote: Hi all, As we know gluster block storage creation and maintanace is