Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging in a multi-brick daemon

2017-02-15 Thread Ravishankar N
On 02/16/2017 04:09 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote: One of the issues that has come up with multiplexing is that all of the bricks in a process end up sharing a single log file. The reaction from both of the people who have mentioned this is that we should find a way to give each brick its own log

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging in a multi-brick daemon

2017-02-15 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On 16 February 2017 at 07:30, Shyam wrote: > On 02/15/2017 08:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 04:09, Jeff Darcy > > wrote: >> >> One of the issues that has come up with multiplexing is that all of

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging in a multi-brick daemon

2017-02-15 Thread Shyam
On 02/15/2017 08:51 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 04:09, Jeff Darcy > wrote: One of the issues that has come up with multiplexing is that all of the bricks in a process end up sharing a single log file. The reaction

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging in a multi-brick daemon

2017-02-15 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 at 04:09, Jeff Darcy wrote: > One of the issues that has come up with multiplexing is that all of the > bricks in a process end up sharing a single log file. The reaction from > both of the people who have mentioned this is that we should find a way to >

[Gluster-devel] Release 3.10: Request fix status for RC1 tagging

2017-02-15 Thread Shyam
Hi, The 3.10 release tracker [1], shows 6 bugs needing a fix in 3.10. We need to get RC1 out so that we can start tracking the same for a potential release. Request folks on these bugs to provide a date by when we can expect a fix for these issues. Request others to add any other bug to

[Gluster-devel] Logging in a multi-brick daemon

2017-02-15 Thread Jeff Darcy
One of the issues that has come up with multiplexing is that all of the bricks in a process end up sharing a single log file. The reaction from both of the people who have mentioned this is that we should find a way to give each brick its own log even when they're in the same process, and make

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10: Backports (reminder and action needed)

2017-02-15 Thread Shyam
Hi, Checking back on status this week. Everything looks good, the 2 missing backports are also in (thanks Ashish). We probably will have one last check pre-release. Thanks, Shyam On 02/06/2017 01:12 PM, Shyam wrote: Hi, A recheck after one more week, and our status is healthy, backports

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10: Testing feedback requested

2017-02-15 Thread Shyam
Hi, We have some feedback on the glusterd and bitrot issues. I am testing out upgrade in CentOS and also doing some performance regression testing across AFR and EC volumes, results expected by end of this week. Request others to post updates to tests done on the issues. If people are

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 3.10 spurious(?) regression failures in the past week

2017-02-15 Thread Shyam
Update from week of: (2017-02-06 to 2017-02-13) No major failures to report this week, things look fine from a regression suite failure stats perspective. Do we have any updates on the older cores? Specifically, - https://build.gluster.org/job/centos6-regression/3046/consoleText