[Gluster-devel] Proposal for a transaction framework for Gluster

Hi, I've opened a github issue [1] to discuss the implementation of a transaction framework that should provide a level of abstraction for xlators that currently use inodelk/entrylk, simplifying its coding and improving performance. Feel free to provide your thoughts. Thanks, Xavi [1]

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Health Report tool

Hi, since people are suggesting nagios then I can't resist suggesting exporting the metrics in the prometheus format, or at least making the project into a library so https://github.com/prometheus/client_python could be used to export the prometheus metrics. There has been an attempt at

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Gluster Health Report tool

Very nice! Thanks! On October 25, 2017 8:11:36 AM EDT, Aravinda wrote: >Hi, > >We started a new project to identify issues/misconfigurations in >Gluster nodes. This project is very young and not yet ready for >Production use, Feedback on the existing reports and ideas for

Re: [Gluster-devel] Report ESTALE as ENOENT

Hi Bruce, On 20 October 2017 at 22:22, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 10:19:13AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: >> On 10/11/2017 04:02 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote: >> > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:11:51PM +0530, Raghavendra G wrote: >> >> On Thu,

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2017-10-26-63160cb9 (master branch)

GlusterFS Coverity covscan results are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2017-10-26-63160cb9 ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org