Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Meeting date: 07/09/2018 (July 09th, 2018), 18:30 IST, 13:00 UTC, 09:00 EDT

2018-07-09 Thread Amar Tumballi
Meeting date: 07/09/2018 (July 09th, 2018), 18:30 IST, 13:00 UTC, 09:00 EDT BJ Link - Bridge: https://bluejeans.com/217609845 - Download: https://bluejeans.com/s/FC2Qi Attendance

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 9:30 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran >> wrote: >> >>> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' >>> meeting.Should we still go a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
On Tue, Jul 10, 2018, 9:30 AM Amar Tumballi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' >> meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that? >> >> >> > It would still be a good exercise, IMO. Reducing

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' > meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that? > > > It would still be a good exercise, IMO. Reducing it to 50-60 volumes from 120 now. > On 9 July 2018 at 15:45, Xavi H

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 8:10 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' > meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that? > I m not sure about exactly what was discussed. But reducing the number of volumes may defeat the purpose of the test, as

Re: [Gluster-devel] [fuse-devel] RFC: adding support for copy_file_range()

2018-07-09 Thread Stef Bon
++ looks good to me. I haven't tested them, but thumbs up for the extra functionality. Stef Bon Voorburg the Netherlands ___ Gluster-devel mailing list Gluster-devel@gluster.org https://lists.gluster.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018, 5:41 PM Nithya Balachandran wrote: > We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' > meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that? > Do we know how much will it save us? There is value in some moderate number of volumes (especially if we can ensure they are

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Nithya Balachandran
We discussed reducing the number of volumes in the maintainers' meeting.Should we still go ahead and do that? On 9 July 2018 at 15:45, Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> Hi Deepshikha, >> >> Are you looking into this failure? I can still s

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
Thanks for the patch Xavi :) Regards, Karthik On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 3:45 PM Xavi Hernandez wrote: > On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> Hi Deepshikha, >> >> Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all >> the regression runs. >> > > I

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Xavi Hernandez
On Mon, Jul 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > Hi Deepshikha, > > Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all > the regression runs. > I've executed the failing script on my laptop and all tests finish relatively fast. What seems to take time is the fi

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-infra] bug-1432542-mpx-restart-crash.t failing

2018-07-09 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
Hi Deepshikha, Are you looking into this failure? I can still see this happening for all the regression runs. Thanks & Regards, Karthik On Sun, Jul 8, 2018 at 7:18 AM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > > https://build.gluster.org/job/regression-test-with-multiplex/794/display/redirect > has the same test