Hi, Gluster Experts,
In glusterfs version 3.12.3, There seems a “fstat” issue for ctime after we use
fsync,
We have a demo execute binary which write some data and then do fsync for this
file, it named as “tt”,
Then run tar command right after “tt” command, it will always error with “tar:
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results for the master branch are available from
http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-07-19-1ee1666d/
Coverity covscan results for other active branches are also available at
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Jim Kinney wrote:
> Too bad the RDMA will be abandoned. It's the perfect transport for
> intranode processing and data sync.
>
>
> I currently use RDMA on a computational cluster between nodes and gluster
> storage. The older IB cards will support 10G IP and
Once you are done with your bit for Gluster documentation, please update
your contributions here [2] for better co-ordination.
Thanks,
Vijay
[2] http://bit.ly/gluster-doc-hack-report
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:57 AM Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hey All,
>
> We are organizing a hackathon to improve
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Lian, George (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
george.l...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Hi, Gluster Experts,
>
>
>
> In glusterfs version 3.12.3, There seems a “fstat” issue for ctime after
> we use fsync,
>
> We have a demo execute binary which write some data and then do fsync
+Ravi
On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Lian, George (NSB - CN/Hangzhou) <
george.l...@nokia-sbell.com> wrote:
> Hi, Gluster Experts,
>
>
>
> In glusterfs version 3.12.3, There seems a “fstat” issue for ctime after
> we use fsync,
>
> We have a demo execute binary which write some data and then
*Hi all,Over last 12 years of Gluster, we have developed many features, and
continue to support most of it till now. But along the way, we have figured
out better methods of doing things. Also we are not actively maintaining
some of these features.We are now thinking of cleaning up some of these
