Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On 31 July 2018 at 22:11, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and > here's what I can summarize. > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 5:58 PM, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > Why not revert, fix and resubmit (unless you can quickly fix it)? > Y. > https://review.gluster.org/20634 > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 5:04 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa > wrote: > >> Will take a look. >> >> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika

[Gluster-devel] Coverity covscan for 2018-08-03-93d7f3f2 (master branch)

2018-08-03 Thread staticanalysis
GlusterFS Coverity covscan results for the master branch are available from http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/static-analysis/master/glusterfs-coverity/2018-08-03-93d7f3f2/ Coverity covscan results for other active branches are also available at

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Yaniv Kaul
Why not revert, fix and resubmit (unless you can quickly fix it)? Y. On Fri, Aug 3, 2018, 5:04 PM Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > Will take a look. > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay > wrote: > >> Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it >> was

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Milind Changire
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 11:04 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri < pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 10:03 PM Pranith Kumar Karampuri < > pkara...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:19 PM Atin Mukherjee >> wrote: >> >>> New addition - tests/basic/volume.t - failed twice

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 4:01 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar < khire...@redhat.com> wrote: > Hi Du/Poornima, > > I was analysing bitrot and geo-rep failures and I suspect there is a bug > in some perf xlator > that was one of the cause. I was seeing following behaviour in few runs. > > 1. Geo-rep

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:07 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, >>> wrote: >>> I just went

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
Will take a look. On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 PM, Krutika Dhananjay wrote: > Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it > was abandoned. > > -Krutika > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> Using git bisect, the patch that introduced

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Hi Du/Poornima, I was analysing bitrot and geo-rep failures and I suspect there is a bug in some perf xlator that was one of the cause. I was seeing following behaviour in few runs. 1. Geo-rep synced data to slave. It creats empty file and then rsync syncs data. But test does "stat --format

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Krutika Dhananjay
Adding Raghavendra G who actually restored and reworked on this after it was abandoned. -Krutika On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:38 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: > Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : > > commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c > Author: Krutika

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 2:12 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya > wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, >> wrote: >> >>> I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and >>> here's what I can

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On 31 July 2018 at 22:11, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and > here's what I can summarize. > > > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Using git bisect, the patch that introduced this behaviour is : commit 7131de81f72dda0ef685ed60d0887c6e14289b8c Author: Krutika Dhananjay Date: Tue Jan 17 16:40:04 2017 +0530 performance/readdir-ahead: Invalidate cached dentries if they're modified while in cache Krutika, can you take a

Re: [Gluster-devel] tests/bugs/distribute/bug-1122443.t - spurious failure

2018-08-03 Thread Nithya Balachandran
This is a new issue - the test uses ls -l to get some information. With the latest master, ls -l returns strange results the first time it is called on the mount point causing the test to fail: With the latest master, I created a single brick volume and some files inside it. [root@rhgs313-6 ~]#

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] Release 5: Master branch health report (Week of 30th July)

2018-08-03 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 11:00 PM Karthik Subrahmanya wrote: > > > On Tue 31 Jul, 2018, 10:17 PM Atin Mukherjee, wrote: > >> I just went through the nightly regression report of brick mux runs and >> here's what I can summarize. >> >> >>