Adding gluster-devel ML.
Only concern to my earlier proposal was not making regression runs wait for
reviews, but to be triggered automatically after successful smoke.
The ask was to put burden on machines than on developers, which I agree to
start with. Lets watch the expenses due to this change
Regression on release-5 branch is also failing because of this. Can we have
backport Kotresh's patch https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22829/ to
these branches.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 6:06 PM Anoop C S wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 10:24 +0530, Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote:
> > Hi Yan
On Fri, 2019-06-07 at 10:24 +0530, Deepshikha Khandelwal wrote:
> Hi Yaniv,
>
> We are working on this. The builders are picking up python3.6 which
> is leading to modules missing and such undefined errors.
>
> Kotresh has sent a patch
> https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/22829/ to fix t
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART:20190625T06Z
DTEND:20190625T07Z
DTSTAMP:20190624T093428Z
ORGANIZER;CN=hgowt...@redhat.com:mailto:hgowt...@redhat.com
UID:7r3gqmjv2hr05hjh8ning7v...@google.com