I'm so glad to read this. I was thinking the same thing.
On Sep 11, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> For distributed store, I would think of MongoDB which provides
>> distributed/replicated/highly available/master read-write/slave read-only
>> database. Lets get what community think about
That's disappointing. I can certainly understand wanting to keep dependencies
small, but that sounds like FUD more than a reasoned argument.
I do not envy your position navigating such waters.
On Sep 8, 2014, at 2:38 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper?
>
>
Is there any reason not to consider zookeeper? The 3.4 release is
quite stable and due to a large number of users, bugs are fixed and
its quirks are known.
I like the idea of RAFT. The paper is well written and very
compelling. The last time I read it, a number of critical issues were
glossed over
