Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-27 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
Regarding the use of malloc vs calloc, i had tried this a while back, though theoretically it should give performance improvement, i was not able to see this in practice for small memory allocations, may be due to the optimizations in the glibc and kernel memory management itself. When i ran a samp

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-27 Thread Niels de Vos
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:44 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > > wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> > >>> All, > >>> > >>> In th

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-26 Thread Vijay Bellur
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 8:44 AM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >>> of the releases, t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 21:14, Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >>> of the releases, the

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 9:24 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: >> Smallfile is part of CI? I am happy to see it documented @ >> https://docs.gluster.org/en/latest/Administrator%20Guide/Performance%20Testing/#smallfile-distributed-io-benchmark >> , so at least one can know how to execute it manually. > > > F

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:43 PM Yaniv Kaul wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >>> of the releases, t

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Yaniv Kaul
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 5:23 PM Nithya Balachandran wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > >> All, >> >> In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme >> of the releases, there has been lots of changes done on the code >> optimization with a

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Nithya Balachandran
On Thu, 21 Mar 2019 at 16:16, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > All, > > In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme > of the releases, there has been lots of changes done on the code > optimization with an expectation that such changes will have gluster to > provide better per

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-Maintainers] GF_CALLOC to GF_MALLOC conversion - is it safe?

2019-03-21 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 4:16 PM Atin Mukherjee wrote: > All, > > In the last few releases of glusterfs, with stability as a primary theme > of the releases, there has been lots of changes done on the code > optimization with an expectation that such changes will have gluster to > provide better p