On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:58 AM, Amar Tumballi wrote:
> All,
>
> Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your
> co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur
> sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions.
>
> Please go through the
All,
Thanks for participating actively in the discussions. With all your
co-operation we now have a update on maintainers 2.0 proposal. Vijay Bellur
sent a patch last week [1] capturing all the discussions.
Please go through the patch and see if you have any more concerns. There
are many new name
Le mardi 18 avril 2017 à 10:25 +0200, Niels de Vos a écrit :
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > > > In light of community conve
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 04:53:55PM -0700, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
> wrote:
>
> > Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > > Maintainers changes, outli
Following up on this, this revision cycle is meant to be more clear about
owners + peers, and less focused on the Red Hat shorthand for levels of
responsibility.
As far as further goals, I think we can outline Architects and Leads
responsibility in a further cycle. I'll let Vijay respond to a furt
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Michael Scherer
wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> > https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
> >
> > Feedback w
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:40:35AM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> > In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> > Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> > https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
> >
> > Fe
Le jeudi 13 avril 2017 à 18:01 -0700, Amye Scavarda a écrit :
> In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
> Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
> https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
>
> Feedback welcomed!
>
> Note that the goals of this are to expand out our reach
In light of community conversations, I've put some revisions on the
Maintainers changes, outlined in the hackmd pad:
https://hackmd.io/s/SkwiZd4qe
Feedback welcomed!
Note that the goals of this are to expand out our reach as a project
(Gluster.org) and make it easy to define who's a maintainer fo
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> > Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS Maintainers" <
> maintain...@gluster.org>, "Gluster Devel"
> > , "Michael Scherer"
> > Sent: S
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS Maintainers"
> , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Michael Scherer"
> Sent: Saturday, March 25, 2017 5:22:44 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.
- Original Message -
> From: "Pranith Kumar Karampuri"
> To: "Michael Scherer"
> Cc: "Amar Tumballi" , "GlusterFS Maintainers"
> , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 7:12:32 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-Maintainers] [Gluster-devel] Maintainers 2.0 Proposal
>
> Do we also
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management
>> of Gluster maintainers more structured. We intend to make
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:17 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:20 AM, Amar Tumballi
> wrote:
>
>> I don't want to take the discussions in another direction, but want
>> clarity on few things:
>>
>> 1. Does maintainers means they are only rev
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> We have been working on a proposal [1] to make the lifecycle management of
> Gluster maintainers more structured. We intend to make the proposal
> effective around 3.11 (May 2016).
>
> Please review the proposal and let us know yo
15 matches
Mail list logo
