H.
Keep me CCed, please, because for a couple last months I do not follow
GlusterFS development…
On pátek 3. března 2017 21:50:07 CET Niels de Vos wrote:
> At the moment we have three top-level interfaces to maintain in Gluster,
> these are FUSE, Gluster/NFS and gfapi. If any work is needed
> At the moment we have three top-level interfaces to maintain in
> Gluster, these are FUSE, Gluster/NFS and gfapi. If any work is needed
> to support new options, FOPs or other functionalities, we mostly have
> to do the work 3x. Often one of the interfaces gets forgotten
I think the picture's
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:58:12PM -0800, Joe Julian wrote:
> The only concern I have is that according to the README syntax (I haven't
> looked any deeper but I suspect it's a non issue) there's a lack of rdma
> support.
Yes, there are definitely a lot of features that we need to add. This is
one
The only concern I have is that according to the README syntax (I
haven't looked any deeper but I suspect it's a non issue) there's a lack
of rdma support.
Otherwise I'm all for anything that simplifies bug fixing and improves
stability.
On 03/03/2017 12:50 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
At the m
At the moment we have three top-level interfaces to maintain in Gluster,
these are FUSE, Gluster/NFS and gfapi. If any work is needed to support
new options, FOPs or other functionalities, we mostly have to do the
work 3x. Often one of the interfaces gets forgotten, or does not need
the new feature
