And while we're at it, may we please rename the two or three test files
that don't start with bug- to be (foolishly) consistent with the rest of
our tests?
Feeling more ambitious? How about renaming all the bug-$sixdigit.t to
bug-0$sixdigit.t for some even more foolish consistency. (That's a
All,
Since I've had no objections to this idea, I'm going to update the
documentation with this.
Jeff, Could you explain what you meant by 'arranged into
subdirectories'? I didn't understand what you meant by that.
~kaushal
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Jeff Darcy jda...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as
'bug-XXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and
someone looking at just the name wouldn't know what it does.
I suggest that we use slightly more descriptive names to the tests.
Lets name the
On 27/08/2014, at 7:56 AM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
On 08/27/2014 12:21 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
Hi all,
Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as
'bug-XXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and
someone looking at just the name wouldn't
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21:56PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
Hi all,
Currently we name tests associated with a bug with just the bug-id as
'bug-XXX.t'. This naming doesn't provide any context directly, and
someone looking at just the name wouldn't know what it does.
I suggest that we
I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community
wiki or in doc/ directory in the source?
~kaushal
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Niels de Vos nde...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 12:21:56PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
Hi all,
Currently we name tests associated
On 08/27/2014 02:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:50:40PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community
wiki or in doc/ directory in the source?
Seems to be only (?) on the wiki:
-
On 08/27/2014 03:29 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:
On 08/27/2014 02:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 01:50:40PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
I'll do that, if someone could point me to it. Is it on the community
wiki or in doc/ directory in the source?
Seems to be only (?) on the
