Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-08-02 Thread Nigel Babu
> That is fine with me. It is prepared for GlusterFS 5, so nothing needs > to be done for that. Only for 4.1 and 3.12 FreeBSD needs to be disabled > from the smoke job(s). > > I could not find the repo that contains the smoke job, otherwise I would > have tried to send a PR. > > Niels > For future

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-08-01 Thread Niels de Vos
On Wed, Aug 01, 2018 at 09:47:38AM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 07/31/2018 02:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:44:57PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > >> On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > >>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-08-01 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/31/2018 02:12 AM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:44:57PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: >> On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: >>> On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins >>>

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-30 Thread Niels de Vos
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:44:57PM -0400, Shyam Ranganathan wrote: > On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > >> This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins > >> slave(s). With the library available, we can

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-30 Thread Nigel Babu
> > The outcome is to get existing maintained release branches building and > working on FreeBSD, would that be correct? > > If so I think we can use the cherry-picked version, the changes seem > mostly straight forward, and it is possibly easier to maintain. > > Although, I have to ask, what is th

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-30 Thread Shyam Ranganathan
On 07/28/2018 12:45 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: >> This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins >> slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and >> unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our g

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-28 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 03:37:46PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: > This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins > slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and > unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our glusterfs sources. > > Unfortunately building on

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-28 Thread Amar Tumballi
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Niels de Vos wrote: > This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins > slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and > unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our glusterfs sources. > > Unfortunately building on FreeBSD

[Gluster-devel] FreeBSD smoke test may fail for older changes, rebase needed

2018-07-28 Thread Niels de Vos
This Friday argp-standalone got installed on the FreeBSD Jenkins slave(s). With the library available, we can now drop the bundled and unmaintained contrib/argp-standlone/ from our glusterfs sources. Unfortunately building on FreeBSD fails if the header/library is installed. This has been correcte