Re: [Gluster-devel] Need sensible default value for detecting unclean client disconnects

2014-05-20 Thread Niels de Vos
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:30:24PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote: Hi all, the last few days I've been looking at a problem [1] where a client locks a file over a FUSE-mount, and a 2nd client tries to grab that lock too. It is expected that the 2nd client gets blocked until the 1st client

Re: [Gluster-devel] Need sensible default value for detecting unclean client disconnects

2014-05-20 Thread Anand Avati
Niels, This is a good addition. While gluster clients do a reasonably good job at detecting dead/hung servers with ping-timeout, the server side detection has been rather weak. TCP_KEEPALIVE has helped to some extent, for cases where an idling client (which holds a lock) goes dead. However if an