Vijaikumar M wrote:
> >>> SyntaxError: invalid token
> We have marked test './tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t' as bad-test, I
> am not sure about 'SyntaxError' error. I think there is some parsing
> error in the shell script, need to root cause the issue.
The corrupted VM have been restored fro
Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Thanks a lot Emmanuel. The tests seem to be starting fine now.
Until the same bug corrupts system files again. There is very little we
can do about it since the tests run as root.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
On 08/22/2015 06:56 AM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Yes, this is again a test corrupting random system files.
I started rebuild of nbslave7[149] from image...
Done.
Thanks a lot Emmanuel. The tests seem to be starting fine now.
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Yes, this is again a test corrupting random system files.
> I started rebuild of nbslave7[149] from image...
Done.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@g
Avra Sengupta wrote:
> >> + '/opt/qa/build.sh'
> >>File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 601
> >> [2015-08-19 05:45:06.N]:++
G_LOG:./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t: TEST: 85 ! fd_write 3 content
++
> This particular test is currently in bad test and I believe Vijai
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:37:43AM +0530, Vijaikumar M wrote:
> We have marked test './tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t' as bad-test, I am
> not sure about 'SyntaxError' error. I think there is some parsing error in
> the shell script, need to root cause the issue.
Isn't this another instance of G_
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:32:33AM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> Some assumption with FD number in shell is wrong some where. Putting it out
> so that anybody who had better idea can debug faster, I will look into it
> too.
I think you are on the right track. The thing alsays append log lines
On Friday 21 August 2015 10:21 AM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
+ Adding Vijaikumar
On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the
On Aug 21, 2015 10:22, "Avra Sengupta" wrote:
>
> + Adding Vijaikumar
>
>
> On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it
failed at the same point. H
+ Adding Vijaikumar
On 08/20/2015 04:19 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the error:
Build GlusterFS
***
+ '/opt/qa/build
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 12:49:35PM +0200, Niels de Vos wrote:
> This looks again like a NetBSD slave where logs from regression tests
> are overwriting random files. The /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py file
> should be valid Python, and not contain these logs...
n idea: it writes log to the wrong f
Niels de Vos wrote:
> This looks again like a NetBSD slave where logs from regression tests
> are overwriting random files. The /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py file
> should be valid Python, and not contain these logs...
>
> Anyone has any ideas why this happens?
No idea, but perhaps you could t
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/9480/console
- Original Message -
> From: "Susant Palai"
> To: "Emmanuel Dreyfus"
> Sent: Thursday, 20 August, 2015 2:14:11 PM
> Subject: Re: Netbsd build failure
>
> And there is a new failure now:
> https://build.glu
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 03:05:56AM -0400, Susant Palai wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
> the same point. Here is the error:
>
>
> Build GlusterFS
> ***
>
> + '/opt/qa/build.sh'
> File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py", lin
Hi,
I tried running netbsd regression twice on a patch. And twice it failed at
the same point. Here is the error:
Build GlusterFS
***
+ '/opt/qa/build.sh'
File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py", line 601
[2015-08-19 05:45:06.N]:++ G_LOG:./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs
Hello
NetBSD (and any non Linux system) was broken by this change that
introduce linux specific ENOKEY:
http://review.gluster.org/9918
Proposed fix is to turn it into EINVAL:
http://review.gluster.org/10456
This should be addressed quickly, as no change will pass NetBSD
regression until it is fi
Raghavendra Bhat wrote:
> You have mentioned that patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9469/ breaks
> the build on netbsd. Where is it failing?
> I tried to check the link for netbsd tests for the patch
> (http://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd6-smoke/2431/). But I got the below
> error.
Here:
ht
Hi Emmanuel,
You have mentioned that patch http://review.gluster.org/#/c/9469/ breaks
the build on netbsd. Where is it failing?
I tried to check the link for netbsd tests for the patch
(http://build.gluster.org/job/netbsd6-smoke/2431/). But I got the below
error.
Status Code: 404
Excepti
18 matches
Mail list logo
