Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regression Failures for 2 weeks

2016-08-12 Thread Niels de Vos
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:58:38AM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:44:43PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Here are the netbsd regressions for the last 2 weeks. Please let me know if > > there are infra issues particularly in nbslave7h. As far as I can see, it > >

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regression Failures for 2 weeks

2016-08-09 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Jeff Darcy wrote: > I think there's an experiment we should do, which I've discussed with a > couple of others: redefine EXPECT_WITHIN on NetBSD to double or triple > the time given, and see if it makes a difference. I am pretty sure it would help. I already raised a few

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regression Failures for 2 weeks

2016-08-09 Thread Jeff Darcy
> > *96* of *247* regressions failed > > That is huge. Agreed. I think there's an experiment we should do, which I've discussed with a couple of others: redefine EXPECT_WITHIN on NetBSD to double or triple the time given, and see if it makes a difference. Why? Because NetBSD (or perhaps the

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regression Failures for 2 weeks

2016-08-09 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Tue, Aug 09, 2016 at 03:44:43PM +0530, Nigel Babu wrote: > Here are the netbsd regressions for the last 2 weeks. Please let me know if > there are infra issues particularly in nbslave7h. As far as I can see, it > just gets assigned more jobs than other machines, and hence more failures.

[Gluster-devel] NetBSD Regression Failures for 2 weeks

2016-08-09 Thread Nigel Babu
Hello, Here are the netbsd regressions for the last 2 weeks. Please let me know if there are infra issues particularly in nbslave7h. As far as I can see, it just gets assigned more jobs than other machines, and hence more failures. *96* of *247* regressions failed

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-10-23 Thread Ravishankar N
+ gluster-infra All arbiter-statfs.t tests that are failing are on nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org. Loopback mounts are not happening on that slave. Perhaps it needs to be rebooted. -Ravi On 10/23/2015 01:47 PM, Nithya Balachandran wrote: Hi, NetBSD regression runs are failing in

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-10-23 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 01:52:59PM +0530, Ravishankar N wrote: > All arbiter-statfs.t tests that are failing are on > nbslave74.cloud.gluster.org. > Loopback mounts are not happening on that slave. Perhaps it needs to be > rebooted. Indeed: the test passes on nbslave70. Someone reboot nbslave74?

[Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-10-23 Thread Nithya Balachandran
Hi, NetBSD regression runs are failing in /tests/basic/afr/arbiter-statfs.t https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/11065/consoleFull Can someone please take a look? Regards, Nithya ___ Gluster-devel mailing list

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 07:35:30AM -0400, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote: 1. geo-rep does lazy umount of gluster volume which needs to be modified to use 'gf_umount_lazy' provided by libglusterfs, correct? Yes, that spawns umountd, which does its best to emulate lazy unmount,, by trying

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-19 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org To: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com, Avra Sengupta aseng...@redhat.com Cc: gluster-infra gluster-in...@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 12:28:18 PM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-19 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com wrote: Since the geo-rep regression tests are failing only in NetBSD, Is there a way we can mask it's run only in NetBSD and let it run in linux? I am working on geo-rep issues with NetBSD. Once these are fixed we can enable on NetBSD as well.

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-19 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
- From: Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar khire...@redhat.com To: Avra Sengupta aseng...@redhat.com Cc: gluster-infra gluster-in...@gluster.org, Gluster Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:50:00 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures Yes

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-19 Thread Avra Sengupta
Lot of test runs are failing with the following: + '/opt/qa/build.sh' File /usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site.py, line 601 [2015-08-19 05:45:06.N]:++ G_LOG:./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t: TEST: 85 ! fd_write 3 content ++ ^ SyntaxError: invalid token + RET=1 Does it

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-18 Thread Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar
Devel gluster-devel@gluster.org, gluster-infra gluster-in...@gluster.org, Raghavendra Talur rta...@redhat.com Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2015 11:02:08 AM Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures On 08/18/2015 09:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/) with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please abandon 11933. It seems like we

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Avra Sengupta
On 08/18/2015 09:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/) with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could

[Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Avra Sengupta
Hi, The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in the following tests: ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t Is there any recent change that is trigerring this behaviour. Also currently one machine is running NetBSD tests. Can someone with

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Vijaikumar M
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in the following tests: ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known issues with NFS client caching so it is marked

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Avra Sengupta
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote: On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in the following tests: ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t ./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Jiffin Tony Thottan
On 17/08/15 12:29, Vijaikumar M wrote: On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in the following tests: ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t I will look into this issue. -- Jiffin

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Avra Sengupta
Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test. Regards, Avra On 08/17/2015 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote: On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, The NetBSD

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Atin Mukherjee
tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t has been already been added to bad test by http://review.gluster.org/11933 ~Atin On 08/17/2015 02:09 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test. Regards, Avra On

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression failures

2015-08-17 Thread Avra Sengupta
That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/) with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please abandon 11933. Regards, Avra On 08/17/2015 02:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: