> >
> > hmm.. I would prefer an infinite timeout. The only scenario where brick
> > process can forcefully flush leases would be connection lose with
> > rebalance process. The more scenarios where brick can flush leases
> > without knowledge of rebalance process, we open up more race-windows for
>
On 02/09/2016 12:30 PM, Raghavendra G wrote:
Right. But if there are simultaneous access to the same file from
any other client and rebalance process, delegations shall
not be
granted or revoked if granted even though they are operating at
dif
>>Right. But if there are simultaneous access to the same file from
> any other client and rebalance process, delegations shall not be
>> granted or revoked if granted even though they are operating at
>> different offsets. So if you rely only on delegations, migration may
>> n
On 02/09/2016 10:27 AM, Raghavendra G wrote:
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Soumya Koduri mailto:skod...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
F
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
>
>> On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>>
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
Cc: "Glu
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Julian"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 9:08:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
>
>
>
> On
On 02/08/2016 12:18 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Joe Julian"
To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 12:20:27 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
Is this in current release versions?
On 02/08/2016 09:13 AM, Shyam wrote:
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Nithya
Balachandran" , "Shyamsundar
Ranganathan"
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Julian"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2016 12:20:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Rebalance data migration and corruption
>
> Is this in current release versions?
Yes. This bug is p
Is this in current release versions?
On 02/07/2016 07:43 PM, Shyam wrote:
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Nithya
Balachandran" , "Shyamsundar
Rangana
On 02/06/2016 06:36 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Nithya Balachandran"
, "Shyamsundar
Ranganathan"
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:32:40 PM
Subject: Re: Rebalance data m
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Sakshi Bansal" , "Susant Palai"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" , "Nithya Balachandran"
> , "Shyamsundar
> Ranganathan"
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 4:32:40 PM
> Subject: Re: Rebalance data migration and corruption
>
> +gluster-dev
+gluster-devel
>
> Hi Sakshi/Susant,
>
> - There is a data corruption issue in migration code. Rebalance process,
> 1. Reads data from src
> 2. Writes (say w1) it to dst
>
> However, 1 and 2 are not atomic, so another write (say w2) to same region
> can happen between 1. But these two w
13 matches
Mail list logo
