On 02/16/2017 07:23 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
It's *primarily* a test tool. It could also be useful to sysadmins IMO,
hence its inclusion, but I guess I could live with it being left out.
Oh! we can add it no problem, I thought it was a left over by accident.
It might make more sense for
> On an upgrade test, when upgrading clients, glusterfs-fuse RPM now
> needed libgfapi, this is due to gf_attach being packaged as a part of
> glusterfs-fuse.
>
> Jeff, we do not need to package gf_attach, right? This is a test tool,
> if I am correct.
It's *primarily* a test tool. It could
On an upgrade test, when upgrading clients, glusterfs-fuse RPM now
needed libgfapi, this is due to gf_attach being packaged as a part of
glusterfs-fuse.
Jeff, we do not need to package gf_attach, right? This is a test tool,
if I am correct.
Niels, you did add this to .gitignore, but looks
