Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

2015-11-18 Thread Jeff Darcy
On November 18, 2015 at 2:44:39 PM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever (pkale...@redhat.com) wrote: > As expected, I can see there are good numbers in the performance by using > UDS (Unix Domain Socket), please checkout the results (extracted using > Iozone benchmark tool attached above) Those look like

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

2015-11-18 Thread Prasanna Kumar Kalever
On Thursday, November 19, 2015 1:46:30 AM, Jeff Darcy Wrote: > > > > > On November 18, 2015 at 2:44:39 PM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever > (pkale...@redhat.com) wrote: > > As expected, I can see there are good numbers in the performance by using > > UDS (Unix Domain Socket), please checkout the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

2015-11-08 Thread Prasanna Kumar Kalever
On Friday, November 6, 2015 7:46:48 PM, Jeff Darcy Wrote: > On November 6, 2015 at 3:13:01 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever > (pkale...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Humble, I am sure the patches above refer to using Unix Domain sockets > > for volfile transmission.  My proposal is for I/O between processes on

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

2015-11-06 Thread Kaleb KEITHLEY
On 11/06/2015 02:08 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we use TCP loopback connection for communicating between gluster > Client and Server. > Hyper-convergence may also require communication with a server running in the > same hyper-visor. > > I was initially wondering

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

2015-11-06 Thread Jeff Darcy
On November 6, 2015 at 3:13:01 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever (pkale...@redhat.com) wrote: > Humble, I am sure the patches above refer to using Unix Domain sockets > for volfile transmission.  My proposal is for I/O between processes on > the same hypervisor, specially for hyper-convergence scenario