On 22/07/14 22:25, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:02:53 Anoop C S wrote:
I see some other issues to this approach.
1. If the directory is physically created inside the normal namespace of
posix, it will be visible even if you disable the xlator. In this case all
users will
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 22:02:53 Anoop C S wrote:
> > I see some other issues to this approach.
> >
> > 1. If the directory is physically created inside the normal namespace of
> > posix, it will be visible even if you disable the xlator. In this case all
> > users will have uncontrolled access to
On 07/22/2014 06:58 PM, Xavier Hernandez wrote:
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 07:33:44 Jiffin Thottan wrote:
Hi,
There are some issues we are dealing with trash translator(see attachment
for design doc).In our implementation, we create trash directory using
trash translator.Thus trash directories on
On Tuesday 22 July 2014 07:33:44 Jiffin Thottan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are some issues we are dealing with trash translator(see attachment
> for design doc).In our implementation, we create trash directory using
> trash translator.Thus trash directories on different bricks will have
> different gf