- Original Message -
> From: "Atin Mukherjee" <amukh...@redhat.com>
> To: "Mohammed Rafi K C" <rkavu...@redhat.com>, "Gluster Devel"
> <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2016 12:34:12 PM
> Subject: Re: [
I've added my comments in the document. I also feel that getting an
user's experience on the command semantics is much required, so mind to
open this up in gluster-users ML too?
On 06/21/2016 11:31 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for
The current doc is read-only. Could you please open up the permissions
to add comments?
~Atin
On 06/21/2016 11:31 AM, Mohammed Rafi K C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for rebalance, as
> the migration daemon uses the framework for rebalance process. Because
Hi,
The current implementation of Tiering lacks support for rebalance, as
the migration daemon uses the framework for rebalance process. Because
of this constraints, we were forced to remove support for add/remove
brick on a tired volume.
We are now focusing to bring rebalance support along with
