Re: [Gluster-devel] Testing SEEK_HOLE performance

2015-05-10 Thread Niels de Vos
On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 05:50:56AM -0300, Christopher Pereira wrote: Hi, I did a local sparse image copy benchmark copying from a gluster mount (of a local gluster-server) vs copying directly from the gluster-brick to test SEEK_HOLE support and performance. Motivation : VM's image files are

Re: [Gluster-devel] Testing SEEK_HOLE performance

2015-05-10 Thread Christopher Pereira
On 10-05-2015 7:30, Niels de Vos wrote: [...] This shows two read calls over the network: 1. offset: 0; size: 131072 2. offset: 131072; size: 131072 There are no lseek() requests for SEEK_HOLE/SEEK_DATA sent over the network. Looking into the operations (FOPs) that are available to the

[Gluster-devel] Testing SEEK_HOLE performance

2015-05-09 Thread Christopher Pereira
Hi, I did a local sparse image copy benchmark copying from a gluster mount (of a local gluster-server) vs copying directly from the gluster-brick to test SEEK_HOLE support and performance. Motivation : VM's image files are sparse. Benchmark: cp /mnt/gluster-mount/image to /tmp/ = takes