uot;Jeff Darcy" <jda...@redhat.com>
> > To: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com>, "Ira Cooper" <i...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> > Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 12:04:29 AM
> > Subje
ff Darcy" <jda...@redhat.com>
> To: "Niels de Vos" <nde...@redhat.com>, "Ira Cooper" <i...@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Gluster Devel" <gluster-devel@gluster.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 5, 2015 12:04:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-d
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:34:56PM -0500, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Kaleb KEITHLEY writes:
>
> > On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> >> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Brief Background:
> >>>
> >>> For the
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:51:41AM -0500, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Niels de Vos writes:
>
> > On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:34:56PM -0500, Ira Cooper wrote:
> >> Kaleb KEITHLEY writes:
> >>
> >> > On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> >> >> Poornima
On 12/04/2015 07:51 AM, Ira Cooper wrote:
>
why not use storage in the client_t instead of thread local?
>>>
>>> It comes down to the use case. For Samba, the right spot is almost
>>> certainly the fd, because lease keys are a per-handle (which we map to
>>> fd) property.
>>>
>>>
Niels de Vos writes:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 06:34:56PM -0500, Ira Cooper wrote:
>> Kaleb KEITHLEY writes:
>>
>> > On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
>> >> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>
>> >>>
On December 4, 2015 at 8:25:10 AM, Niels de Vos (nde...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Okay, so you meant to say that client_t "is a horror show" for this
> particular use-case (lease_id). It indeed does not sound suitable to use
> client_t here.
>
> I'm not much of a fan for using Thread Local Storage
Hi,
Brief Background:
For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from the
applications for most number of fops.
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11980/
For leases to work as explained in the above doc, every file
On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Brief Background:
>>
>> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
>> the applications for most number of fops.
>>
On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 09:11:34AM -0500, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Brief Background:
>
> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
> the applications for most number of fops.
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
>
Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
> Hi,
>
> Brief Background:
>
> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
> the applications for most number of fops.
> http://review.gluster.org/#/c/12014/
>
Kaleb KEITHLEY writes:
> On 12/03/2015 03:10 PM, Ira Cooper wrote:
>> Poornima Gurusiddaiah writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Brief Background:
>>>
>>> For the below two features, we need ligfapi to take 2 other parameters from
>>> the
12 matches
Mail list logo