On 04/21/2015 01:00 AM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Another option would be to maintain a file with this list in the tests
directory. run-tests.sh can lookup this file to determine whether it
should continue or bail out.
Alternatively^2, I could modify http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10277/ to
run such tes
Vijay Bellur wrote:
> Another option would be to maintain a file with this list in the tests
> directory. run-tests.sh can lookup this file to determine whether it
> should continue or bail out.
NetBSD's /opt/qa/regression.sh does this:
# Disable always-failing cases
for i in ./tests/basic/afr
> Another option would be to maintain a file with this list in the tests
> directory. run-tests.sh can lookup this file to determine whether it
> should continue or bail out.
Alternatively^2, I could modify http://review.gluster.org/#/c/10277/ to
run such tests and ignore the results instead of sk
On 20 Apr 2015, at 20:02, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> On 04/21/2015 12:19 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
>> On 20 Apr 2015, at 18:53, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I propose that we don't drop test units but provide an ack to patches
that have known regression failures.
>>>
>>> IIRC maintainers have had permis
On 04/21/2015 12:19 AM, Justin Clift wrote:
On 20 Apr 2015, at 18:53, Jeff Darcy wrote:
I propose that we don't drop test units but provide an ack to patches
that have known regression failures.
IIRC maintainers have had permission to issue such overrides since a
community meeting some months
On 20 Apr 2015, at 18:53, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> I propose that we don't drop test units but provide an ack to patches
>> that have known regression failures.
>
> IIRC maintainers have had permission to issue such overrides since a
> community meeting some months ago, but such overrides have remain
> I propose that we don't drop test units but provide an ack to patches
> that have known regression failures.
IIRC maintainers have had permission to issue such overrides since a
community meeting some months ago, but such overrides have remained
rare. What should we do to ensure that currently
> IMO, if we start skipping test cases we may not be able to
> uncover bugs. Thoughts?
The purpose of a regression test is to catch unanticipated
problems related to new changes. Once a problem is already
known, a series of tradeoffs must be evaluated.
* What new information is gained by contin
On 04/20/2015 10:39 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Are you meaning deleting the tests temporarily (to let other stuff
pass without being held up by it), or permanently?
Kind of both. I think the tests should be deleted so they don't
interfere with other work, but that means we'll have features without
> Are you meaning deleting the tests temporarily (to let other stuff
> pass without being held up by it), or permanently?
Kind of both. I think the tests should be deleted so they don't
interfere with other work, but that means we'll have features without
tests. Lack of a test should be consider
On 04/20/2015 06:44 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> The same problems that affect mainline are affecting release-3.7 too. We
>> need to get over this soon.
>
> I think it's time to start skipping (or even deleting) some tests. For
> example, volume-snapshot-clone.t alone is responsible for a huge numb
On 20 Apr 2015, at 14:14, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>> The same problems that affect mainline are affecting release-3.7 too. We
>> need to get over this soon.
>
> I think it's time to start skipping (or even deleting) some tests. For
> example, volume-snapshot-clone.t alone is responsible for a huge num
> The same problems that affect mainline are affecting release-3.7 too. We
> need to get over this soon.
I think it's time to start skipping (or even deleting) some tests. For
example, volume-snapshot-clone.t alone is responsible for a huge number
of spurious failures. It's for a feature that pe
On 04/19/2015 05:39 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
Hi
Is it possible at all to pass regression on release-3.7? I retry,
rebase, but I still get failures unrelated to my changes.
The same problems that affect mainline are affecting release-3.7 too. We
need to get over this soon.
Thanks,
Vijay
Hi
Is it possible at all to pass regression on release-3.7? I retry,
rebase, but I still get failures unrelated to my changes.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http:
15 matches
Mail list logo
