On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Michael Scherer
wrote:
> Le lundi 09 mai 2016 à 16:16 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
> > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Michael Scherer
> wrote:
> >
> > > Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 à 10:42 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
>
Le lundi 09 mai 2016 à 16:16 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
> On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
>
> > Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 à 10:42 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
> > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> > >
> > >
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le mercredi 04 mai 2016 à 10:42 +0530, Rajesh Joseph a écrit :
> > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >
> > > It seems that a snaphot regression test managed to trigger a core
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 3:04 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> It seems that a snaphot regression test managed to trigger a core dump
> in dmeventd. Because our regression tests check for cores, the test was
> marked as a failure (mostly a 'good' thing).
>
> I'd appreciate it if one of
It seems that a snaphot regression test managed to trigger a core dump
in dmeventd. Because our regression tests check for cores, the test was
marked as a failure (mostly a 'good' thing).
I'd appreciate it if one of the developers of snapshot can have a look
at the core from dmeventd and maybe