[Gluster-devel] Bugs with incorrect status

2016-06-13 Thread Niels de Vos
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 09:06:53 + 1265893 (mainline) ON_QA: Perf: Getting bad performance while doing ls [master] If2e1a2 dht: improving readdir performance (NEW) [master] I716d48 storage/posix: Reduce number of getxattrs for internal xattrs (MERGED) [master] I8d1b2a storage/posix:

[Gluster-devel] Replacing a host using gdeploy

2016-06-13 Thread Sachidananda URS
Hi, With the replace node operation being very tedious and elaborate process, it is easy to commit mistakes. And it is much tedious process to roll back in case of mistakes. This is an effort to automate the entire process, the script replace_node.sh is a wrapper script around gdeploy

[Gluster-devel] Brick multiplexing approaches

2016-06-13 Thread Jeff Darcy
"Brick multiplexing" is a new feature, tentatively part of 4.0, that allows multiple bricks to be served from a single glusterfsd process. This promises to give us many benefits over the current "process per brick" approach. * Lower total memory use, by having only one copy of various global

Re: [Gluster-devel] Meaning of various log files

2016-06-13 Thread Kaushal M
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:19 PM, jayakrishnan mm wrote: > Hi , > > I see some overlapping information between > /var/log/glusterfs/glustershd.log and > > /var/log/glusterfs/mnt-gluster-.log. What is the difference > between these logs? > > volume name is ec-vol > >

[Gluster-devel] ./tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t regression failure

2016-06-13 Thread Poornima Gurusiddaiah
Hi, The test ./tests/basic/afr/self-heald.t creates a core and fails test 38, 53, 68. Link for the regression https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-netbsd7-regression-triggered/17536/console Can you please take a look at it? Regards, Poornima

Re: [Gluster-devel] Meaning of various log files

2016-06-13 Thread jayakrishnan mm
Thanks Kaushal. I saw this document. It is helpful Best regards JK On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Kaushal M wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:19 PM, jayakrishnan mm > wrote: > > Hi , > > > > I see some overlapping information between > >