[Gluster-devel] Update on GCS 0.5 release

2018-12-24 Thread Atin Mukherjee
We've decided to delay GCS 0.5 release and postpone by few days (new date : 1st week of Jan) considering (a) most of the team members are out on holidays (b) some of the critical issues/PRs are yet to be addressed from [1] . Regards, GCS team [1] https://waffle.io/gluster/gcs?label=GCS%2F0.5

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

2018-12-24 Thread Raghavendra Gowdappa
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 3:40 PM Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay < sankarshan.mukhopadh...@gmail.com> wrote: > [pulling the conclusions up to enable better in-line] > > > Conclusions: > > > > We should never have a volume with caching-related xlators disabled. The > price we pay for it is too high. We

Re: [Gluster-devel] Implementing multiplexing for self heal client.

2018-12-24 Thread RAFI KC
On 12/21/18 6:56 PM, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote: On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM RAFI KC wrote: Hi All, What is the problem? As of now self-heal client is running as one daemon per node, this means even if there are multiple volumes, there will only be one self-heal daemon. So to take

[Gluster-devel] Weekly Untriaged Bugs

2018-12-24 Thread jenkins
[...truncated 6 lines...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1654778 / build: Please update GlusterFS documentation to describe how to do a non-root install https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1660404 / core: Conditional freeing of string after returning from dict_set_dynstr function

Re: [Gluster-devel] Implementing multiplexing for self heal client.

2018-12-24 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 6:30 PM RAFI KC wrote: > > Hi All, > > What is the problem? > As of now self-heal client is running as one daemon per node, this means > even if there are multiple volumes, there will only be one self-heal > daemon. So to take effect of each configuration changes in the

Re: [Gluster-devel] Latency analysis of GlusterFS' network layer for pgbench

2018-12-24 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
[pulling the conclusions up to enable better in-line] > Conclusions: > > We should never have a volume with caching-related xlators disabled. The > price we pay for it is too high. We need to make them work consistently and > aggressively to avoid as many requests as we can. Are there current