On 13/05/2014, at 11:43 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
Me and Kaushal have effected the following changes on regression.sh in
build.gluster.org:
1. If a regression run results in a core and all tests pass, that particular
run will be flagged as a failure. Previously a core that would
At last week's community meeting we tentatively agreed on tomorrow — May
14th — as the date we would release 3.4.4beta and 3.5.1alpha.
Three changes for 3.4.4 need to be reviewed before they can be merged:
1 Ubuntu code audit results (blocking inclusion in Ubuntu Main repo):
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote:
On 13/05/2014, at 11:43 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
Hi All,
Me and Kaushal have effected the following changes on regression.sh in
build.gluster.org:
1. If a regression run results in a core and all tests pass, that
On Tue, May 13, 2014 6:33 am, Ric Wheeler wrote:
On 05/07/2014 05:17 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 05/06/2014 10:44 PM, B.K.Raghuram wrote:
For those of us who are toying with the idea of using ZFS as the
underlying filesystem but are hesitating only because it is not widely
tested, a
On 14 May 2014 07:55, Dan Mons dm...@cuttingedge.com.au wrote:
What's the goal for both RHEL and GlusterFS as far as BtrFS goes?
RHEL7 seems to be going the conservative path with BtrFS still being
marked beta/testing. Is there a roadmap to move it on past this?
This showed up in some
On 13/05/2014, at 12:47 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Justin Clift jus...@gluster.org wrote:
On 13/05/2014, at 11:43 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
snip
Do let us know if you have any comments on these changes.
Would you be ok to push these changes into the scripts on
the
to Krishnan Parthasarathi:
thank you very much for your help,
As you said, I use stap -d /usr/local/sbin/glusterfs --ldd -e 'probe
process(/usr/local/lib/glusterfs/3.5/xlator/mount/fuse.so).function(*){print_ubacktrace()}'
,
systemtap can output the fuse module function of the stack ,
But
