On 08/12/2014 08:25 AM, Ruoyu wrote:
>
> On 2014年08月12日 10:33, Ruoyu wrote:
>> Hi gluster developers,
>>
>> In the file cli/src/cli-rpc-ops.c, at line 4611, duplicated branches
>> for if and else is found. Is it a typo?
Yes it is :) You can send in a fix for this following the guideline link
sha
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZNAME:IST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:7b49ac44-ffca-4de4-a179-f9edde80bf1e
SUMMARY:Gluster Communi
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 09:53:19PM -0700, Anand Avati wrote:
> If FUSE implements proper direct_io semantics (somewhat like how O_DIRECT
> flag is handled) and allows the mode to be enabled by the FS in open_cbk,
> then I guess such a special handling of 0-byte need not be necessary? At
> least it
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Anand Avati wrote:
>
> > If FUSE implements proper direct_io semantics (somewhat like how O_DIRECT
> > flag is handled) and allows the mode to be enabled by the FS in open_cbk,
> > then I guess such a special handling of 0-byte need not
hi,
Welcome to glusterfs :-). Could you please follow the instructions
here to send the patch.
http://www.gluster.org/community/documentation/index.php/Simplified_dev_workflow
Pranith.
On 08/12/2014 08:52 AM, Ruoyu wrote:
fix dangerous usage of volname because strncpy does not always
null-
fix dangerous usage of volname because strncpy does not always
null-terminated.
Signed-off-by: Ruoyu
---
xlators/nfs/server/src/nfs-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xlators/nfs/server/src/nfs-common.c
b/xlators/nfs/server/src/nfs-common.c
index f74396
On 2014?08?12? 10:33, Ruoyu wrote:
Hi gluster developers,
In the file cli/src/cli-rpc-ops.c, at line 4611, duplicated branches
for if and else is found. Is it a typo?
4607 case GF_GSYNC_OPTION_TYPE_STATUS:
4608 status_detail = dict_get_str_boolean (dic
Hi gluster developers,
In the file cli/src/cli-rpc-ops.c, at line 4611, duplicated branches for
if and else is found. Is it a typo?
4607 case GF_GSYNC_OPTION_TYPE_STATUS:
4608 status_detail = dict_get_str_boolean (dict,
4609 "status-detail",
4610 _gf_fal
- Original Message -
> The next nightly builds will upload the tarball too. A new nightly build
> will only be done when new changes are merged. So depending on the
> release, you may need to wait a few days.
>
> The new location for the tarballs and src.rpms is:
> - http://download.gluste
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 01:56:16PM -0400, Justin Clift wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
> > Nightly builds from release-3.6 are now available at [2]. Testing
> > feedback for these nightly builds would be very welcome!
>
>
> > [2] http://download.gluster.org/pub/gluster/glusterfs/nightly
On 08/12/2014 11:29 AM, Harshavardhana wrote:
This is a standard problem where there are split-brains in distributed
systems. For example even in git there are cases where it gives up asking
users to fix the file i.e. merge conflicts. If the user doesn't want
split-brains they should move to rep
On 07/25/2014 03:59 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Patch [1] introduces a new feature of glusterd where one can list down a
> specific or all volume options with a glusterd command.
>
> Request you to let me know your thoughts. I will be also creating a
> feature page for the same in s
Hi All,
Request you to have a look at http://review.gluster.org/#/c/8375/
This patch introduces a new system command by which user can change the
glusterd log level.
~Atin
___
Gluster-devel mailing list
Gluster-devel@gluster.org
http://supercolony.glust
13 matches
Mail list logo
