sure!
Regards,
-Prashanth Pai
- Original Message -
From: "Humble Devassy Chirammal"
To: "Prashanth Pai"
Cc: "Harshavardhana" , "Ben England"
, "gluster-devel"
Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2014 12:03:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] update-link-count-parent POSIX xlator parameter
Hi
Hi Prasanth,
Its worth to have in our GlusterFS source doc . Can you send a patch on
this ?
--Humble
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Prashanth Pai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently came across this when I was looking for various ways to convert
> GFID to Path[1].
> I have tested "build-pgfid" opt
thanks!
Swiftonfile project needed file creation/deletion notifications (op+path) from
glusterfs to update Swift's databases. inotify on bricks is not recursive and
does not scale well. Looked into changelog (which logs only gfids). Even if one
assumes that gfid to path conversion can be done e
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Prashanth Pai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I recently came across this when I was looking for various ways to convert
> GFID to Path[1].
> I have tested "build-pgfid" option for basic sanity. It's documented in the
> commit msg of change[2]. Found one small issue[3]. There
Hi,
I recently came across this when I was looking for various ways to convert GFID
to Path[1].
I have tested "build-pgfid" option for basic sanity. It's documented in the
commit msg of change[2]. Found one small issue[3]. There could be others.
Users should be aware that these xattrs generated
On 08/21/2014 08:23 AM, everybody_en...@163.com wrote:
hi all:
I have a problem about split-brain, details as below:
PC1 and PC2 is AFR, stored a file 1.txt
1. write "123" to 1.txt, then 1.txt in pc1 is same with 1.txt in PC2,
content is "123"
2. PC1 network disconnect, write "45" to 1.tx
> Using git over ssh often fails, is it the same problem? I never
> investigated, but using HTTP is reliable. I often have to run rfc.sh
> three or four times before it works.
>
It seems like a 'gerrit' bug at the moment, its fixed with 'git gc' on
the server no corruption reported :-).
--
Relig
hi all:
I have a problem about split-brain, details as below:
PC1 and PC2 is AFR, stored a file 1.txt
1. write "123" to 1.txt, then 1.txt in pc1 is same with 1.txt in PC2, content
is "123"
2. PC1 network disconnect, write "45" to 1.txt, then content of 1.txt in pc1
is "123",
conten
Harshavardhana wrote:
> ERROR: Could not clone repository
Using git over ssh often fails, is it the same problem? I never
investigated, but using HTTP is reliable. I often have to run rfc.sh
three or four times before it works.
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Justin Clift wrote:
> Any ideas?
>
>
Avati just fixed it
We had to run 'git gc' directly on the gerrit server - gerrit gc
failed (could be a gerrit bug).
Suspecting the EOF unpack errors to be gerrit bug as well, we should
be updating it to latest release perhap
Any ideas?
+ Justin
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Harshavardhana
> Subject: Re: Change in glusterfs[master]: Regression test portability: mktemp
> Date: 20 August 2014 10:30:29 PM GMT+01:00
> To: Justin Clift , Vijay Bellur ,
> Gluster Devel
>
> Again with the unpack issue with git
>
>>
Again with the unpack issue with git
>
> Build Failed
>
> http://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-rpms/556/ : SUCCESS
>
> http://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-rpms-el6/556/ : FAILURE
>
Receiving objects: 2% (2239/81742), 579.83 KiB | 854.00 KiB/s
Receiving objects: 3% (2453/81742), 579.83 Ki
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ben England wrote:
> What is update-link-count-parent POSIX xlator parameter for? Is it ever set
> by anyone and why? It appears to be off by default. Didn't see this
> documented, but the log message in posix.c says: "update-link-count-parent
> is enabled.
What is update-link-count-parent POSIX xlator parameter for? Is it ever set by
anyone and why? It appears to be off by default. Didn't see this documented,
but the log message in posix.c says: "update-link-count-parent is enabled.
Thus for each file an extended attribute representing the num
On 20/08/2014, at 9:30 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
>> Should we be aiming to get these into 3.6, in time for the upcoming test
>
> Yes we should, the real issue is the amount of reviews they are
> pending. btw when was 3.6 test day decided?
We're waiting for some other fixes for 3.6 to go in first
> Should we be aiming to get these into 3.6, in time for the upcoming test
Yes we should, the real issue is the amount of reviews they are
pending. btw when was 3.6 test day decided?
--
Religious confuse piety with mere ritual, the virtuous confuse
regulation with outcomes
__
On 20/08/2014, at 6:52 PM, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I accumulated a few NetBSD patches that were all validated but still await
> review. Anyone would like to help moving them forward?
>
> Everything is there:
> http://review.gluster.org/#/q/owner:%22Emmanuel+Dreyfus%22+status:open,n,z
Should we
Hi gluster-devel team,
We are running a 2 replica volume in 2 servers. One of our service daemon
open a file with 'flock' in the volume. We can see every glusterfsd daemon
open the replica files in its own server(in /proc/pid/fd). When we pull off
the cable of one server about 10 minutes then re-p
Hi
I accumulated a few NetBSD patches that were all validated but still await
review. Anyone would like to help moving them forward?
Everything is there:
http://review.gluster.org/#/q/owner:%22Emmanuel+Dreyfus%22+status:open,n,z
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
___
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 07:16:16PM +0800, Jaden Liang wrote:
> Hi gluster-devel team,
>
> We are running a 2 replica volume in 2 servers. One of our service daemon
> open a file with 'flock' in the volume. We can see every glusterfsd daemon
> open the replica files in its own server(in /proc/pid/f
This week's Community meeting was very productive, with lots of discussion
and plans made. :)
Highlights:
* Initial ETA for a GlusterFS 3.5.3 beta is Fri 29th August
We're waiting on some patches for DHT to be reviewed and merged.
* GlusterFS 3.6 Test day is being pushed back a week
Hi,
Three changes are in desperate need of review. FWIW, Ubuntu would not
update to a recent release of GlusterFS without these fixes, so we
finessed these into 3.4.x (i.e. we did not wait for them on the master
branch) but the same fixes are needed in the the other branches,
including the ma
Hi gluster-devel team,
We are running a 2 replica volume in 2 servers. One of our service daemon
open a file with 'flock' in the volume. We can see every glusterfsd daemon
open the replica files in its own server(in /proc/pid/fd). When we pull off
the cable of one server about 10 minutes then re-p
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:Zimbra-Calendar-Provider
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Asia/Kolkata
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETTO:+0530
TZOFFSETFROM:+0530
TZNAME:IST
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:7b49ac44-ffca-4de4-a179-f9edde80bf1e
RRULE:FREQ=WEEKLY;INTER
24 matches
Mail list logo
