Still hitting this on freebsd and netbsd smoke runs on release 3.6
branch. Are we merging patches on release 3.6 branch for now even with
these failures. I have two such patches that need to be merged.
Regards,
Avra
On 07/06/2015 02:32 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 02:19:07P
- Original Message -
> From: "Anoop C S"
> To: gluster-devel@gluster.org
> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 6:20:50 PM
> Subject: [Gluster-devel] Implementing Flat Hierarchy for trashed files
>
> Hi all,
>
> As we move forward, in order to fix the limitations with current trash
> translato
Yes, it makes sense to move both geo-rep test to bad tests for now till.
the issue gets fixed in netBSD. I am looking into it netbsd failures.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Avra Sengupta"
> To: "Atin Mukherjee" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "gluster-infra"
> , "R
On 08/18/2015 10:41 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
> Just a quick update. I was wrong saying the issue is reproducible in
> 3.7. What I could see is this issue is fixed in 3.7. Now I need to find
> out the patch which fixed it and backport it to 3.6. Would it be
> possible for you to upgrade the setup
On 08/18/2015 09:25 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could y
Thanks Emmanuel, I could not look into it as I was out of station.
I will debug it today.
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Emmanuel Dreyfus"
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Friday, August 14, 2015 12:45:49 AM
> Subject: Re
Just a quick update. I was wrong saying the issue is reproducible in
3.7. What I could see is this issue is fixed in 3.7. Now I need to find
out the patch which fixed it and backport it to 3.6. Would it be
possible for you to upgrade the setup to 3.7 if you want a quick solution?
~Atin
On 08/17/2
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 06:20:50PM +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we move forward, in order to fix the limitations with current trash
> translator we are planning to replace the existing criteria for trashed
> files inside trash directory with a general flat hierarchy as described
> in t
On 08/17/2015 02:20 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
> geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
> with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
> abandon 11933.
It seems like w
This approach sounds good. Few inputs/queries inline.
On 08/17/2015 06:20 PM, Anoop C S wrote:
Hi all,
As we move forward, in order to fix the limitations with current trash
translator we are planning to replace the existing criteria for trashed
files inside trash directory with a general flat
> Do we have plans to support "semi-synchronous" type replication in the
> future? By semi-sync I mean writing to one leg the replica, securing the
> write on a faster stable storage (capacitor backed SSD or NVRAM) and then
> acknowledge the client. The write on other replica leg may happen at late
On 08/17/2015 01:19 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
To: "Gluster Devel"
Cc: "Sakshi Bansal"
Sent: Monday, 17 August, 2015 10:39:38 AM
Subject: [Gluster-devel] Serialization of fops acting on same dentry on server
All,
Pranith and m
I've not got a chance to look at it which I will do now. Thanks for
reminder!
-Atin
Sent from one plus one
On Aug 17, 2015 7:19 PM, "Davy Croonen" wrote:
> Hi Atin
>
> Any news on this one?
>
> KR
> Davy
>
> On 12 Aug 2015, at 16:41, Atin Mukherjee
> wrote:
>
> Davy,
>
> I will check this with
Yes for long term backups LVM snapshots might not be the solution. There
is no side effect in backing up the bricks. The data would indeed be
readable. And if you back up "/var/lib/glusterd/vols/" on each
volume as well, you can effectively recreate the volume from the bricks
at a later stage.
Hi all,
As we move forward, in order to fix the limitations with current trash
translator we are planning to replace the existing criteria for trashed
files inside trash directory with a general flat hierarchy as described
in the following sections. Please have your thoughts on following
design co
Hi Athin :)
I shall take Bug 1245380
[RFE] Render all mounts of a volume defunct upon access revocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245380
Thanks & Regards,
Prasanna Kumar K.
- Original Message -
From: "Atin Mukherjee"
To: "Kaushal M"
Cc: "Csaba Henk" , gluster-us..
Dear Rafi,
Thanks for submitting a patch.
@DHT, I have two additional questions / problems.
1. When doing a rebalance (with data) RAM consumption on the nodes goes
dramatically high, eg out of 196 GB available per node, RAM usage would fill up
to 195.6 GB. This seems quite excessive and strang
Hey Gluster Developers,
I'm fairly new to GlusterFS, but noticed, that it is missing the
possibility to control firewalld, which is also addressed in [1]
Since I wanted to propose a solution for this problem, I briefly talked to
Niels de Vos and we identified 2 possible ways to fix this:
1) Use t
On 08/17/2015 01:58 AM, Christophe TREFOIS wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I have successfully added a new node to our setup, and finally managed
> to get a successful fix-layout run as well with no errors.
>
>
>
> Now, as per the documentation, I started a gluster volume rebalance
> live start
That patch itself might not pass all regressions as it might fail at the
geo-rep test. I have sent a patch (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/11934/)
with both the tests being moved to bad test. Talur could you please
abandon 11933.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 02:12 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote:
tes
tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t has been already been added to bad test by
http://review.gluster.org/11933
~Atin
On 08/17/2015 02:09 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
> Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
> ./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
>
> Regards,
> Avra
>
>
Will send a patch moving ./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t and
./tests/geo-rep/georep-basic-dr-rsync.t to bad test.
Regards,
Avra
On 08/17/2015 12:45 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD re
Hey there,
Just checking on the status for this. Still can't login with github onto
gerrit. Added my details to the pad.
RegardsVipul NayyarÂ
On Thursday, 13 August 2015 7:06 PM, M S Vishwanath Bhat
wrote:
Vipul, Please add your name in this pad
https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/glus
On 17/08/15 12:29, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in
the following tests:
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
I will look into this issue.
--
Jiffin
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-
On 08/17/2015 12:29 PM, Vijaikumar M wrote:
On Monday 17 August 2015 12:22 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote:
Hi,
The NetBSD regression tests are continuously failing with errors in
the following tests:
./tests/basic/mount-nfs-auth.t
./tests/basic/quota-anon-fd-nfs.t
quota-anon-fd-nfs.t is known iss
25 matches
Mail list logo
