Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging framework in Gluter 4.0

regards Aravinda http://aravindavk.in On 11/06/2015 12:28 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, As almost all the components targeted for Gluster 4.0 have moved from design phase to implementation phase on some level or another, I feel it's time to get some consensus on the logging framework we are

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging framework in Gluter 4.0

I remember Shyam had done some ground work a while ago on logging improvements. One of the option being explored was rsyslog. I have seen the use of transaction IDs in logs. This usually helps in grouping related log messages as they use same transaction ID. This also speeds up analyzing

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging framework in Gluter 4.0

On 11/06/2015 01:30 PM, Aravinda wrote: > > regards > Aravinda > http://aravindavk.in > > On 11/06/2015 12:28 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: >> Hi, >> >> As almost all the components targeted for Gluster 4.0 have moved from >> design phase to implementation phase on some level or another, I feel >>

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging framework in Gluter 4.0

On 11/06/2015 06:58 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 11/06/2015 01:30 PM, Aravinda wrote: regards Aravinda http://aravindavk.in On 11/06/2015 12:28 PM, Avra Sengupta wrote: Hi, As almost all the components targeted for Gluster 4.0 have moved from design phase to implementation phase on some

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

On 11/06/2015 02:08 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever wrote: > Hi all, > > Currently we use TCP loopback connection for communicating between gluster > Client and Server. > Hyper-convergence may also require communication with a server running in the > same hyper-visor. > > I was initially wondering

Re: [Gluster-devel] Logging framework in Gluter 4.0

-Atin Sent from one plus one On Nov 6, 2015 7:50 PM, "Shyam" wrote: > > On 11/06/2015 06:58 AM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/06/2015 01:30 PM, Aravinda wrote: >>> >>> >>> regards >>> Aravinda >>> http://aravindavk.in >>> >>> On 11/06/2015 12:28 PM, Avra Sengupta

Re: [Gluster-devel] Replacing loopback with Unix Domain Sockets for I/O

On November 6, 2015 at 3:13:01 AM, Prasanna Kumar Kalever (pkale...@redhat.com) wrote: > Humble, I am sure the patches above refer to using Unix Domain sockets > for volfile transmission.  My proposal is for I/O between processes on > the same hypervisor, specially for hyper-convergence scenario

[Gluster-devel] Bugs with incorrect status

#1260012 ON_QA - josfe...@redhat.com - Data Tiering:Regression:New file creates still going to cold tier after attaching tier ** No change posted, but bug is in ON_QA ** #1163071 ON_QA - lmoha...@redhat.com - RHEL 5 noarch repo broken/missing ** No change posted, but bug is in

[Gluster-devel] glfs_write_async buffer

Hi, Wanted to know when is it safe to use the buffer passed to glfs_write_async method. Is it safe to use the buffer right after returning from glfs_write_async method or after the callback is invoked after completion of write request. Thanks and Regards, rcr