Could you paste the back trace?
On 01/05/2016 02:33 PM, Poornima Gurusiddaiah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In upstream regression, looks like the following test has caused
> glusterd to crash.
>
> ./tests/bugs/glusterfs/bug-879490.t
>
> Not sure if its a known crash, here is the link to the regression
I tried to debug the inode* related leaks and seen some improvements
after applying the below patches when ran the same test (but will
smaller load). Could you please apply those patches & confirm the same?
a) http://review.gluster.org/13125
This will fix the inodes & their ctx related leaks
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> Cc: "Vijaikumar Mallikarjuna" , "Emmanuel Dreyfus"
> , "Raghavendra Talur"
> , "Gluster Devel"
Hi,
In upstream regression, looks like the following test has caused glusterd to
crash.
./tests/bugs/glusterfs/bug-879490.t
Not sure if its a known crash, here is the link to the regression links:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17213/consoleFull
Regards,
Hi Atin,
The same test caused glusterd crash for my patch as well.
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17289/consoleFull
Core was generated by `glusterd'.
Program terminated with signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
#0 0x7f8a77b7e223 in dict_lookup_common
We will analyze it and get back. Mind filing a bug for this?
~Atin
On 01/05/2016 03:36 PM, Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar wrote:
> Hi Atin,
>
> The same test caused glusterd crash for my patch as well.
>
> https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17289/consoleFull
>
>
A fix has been sent to:
http://review.gluster.org/13177
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> > To: "Manikandan Selvaganesh"
> > Cc:
Correct, I used FUSE mount. Shouldn't gfapi be used by FUSE mount helper (/
usr/bin/glusterfs)?
On вівторок, 5 січня 2016 р. 22:52:25 EET Soumya Koduri wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 05:56 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > Unfortunately, both patches didn't make any difference for me.
> >
> > I've
On 01/05/2016 05:56 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
Unfortunately, both patches didn't make any difference for me.
I've patched 3.7.6 with both patches, recompiled and installed patched
GlusterFS package on client side and mounted volume with ~2M of files.
The I performed usual tree traverse
Manikandan,
Can you test this fix since you've the setup ready?
regards,
Raghavendra
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:11 PM, Raghavendra G
wrote:
> A fix has been sent to:
> http://review.gluster.org/13177
>
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa
When I was using gluster-native NFS to export volume, I noticed that
there is service 'nlockmgr' with tcp version4, but not with udp version4.
System: Ubuntu 12.04 with GlusterFS 3.5.7
The procedure to reproduce is as follow:
/* assuming glusterfs has been already installed */
Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
> I figured out this issue occurs when "trickling-writes" is on in write-behind
Do you have a idea of what fails at system level? Is it a portability
bug, or something else?
--
Emmanuel Dreyfus
http://hcpnet.free.fr/pubz
m...@netbsd.org
Hi Raghavendra,
I will check out this with the fix and update you soon on this :)
--
Regards,
Manikandan Selvaganesh.
- Original Message -
From: "Raghavendra G"
To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
Cc: "Manikandan Selvaganesh" ,
Hi Atin,
Here is the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296004
Thanks and Regards,
Kotresh H R
- Original Message -
> From: "Atin Mukherjee"
> To: "Kotresh Hiremath Ravishankar"
> Cc: "Poornima Gurusiddaiah"
On 01/06/2016 03:53 AM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
OK, I've repeated the same traversing test with patched GlusterFS API, and
here is new Valgrind log:
https://gist.github.com/17ecb16a11c9aed957f5
Fuse mount doesn't use gfapi helper. Does your above GlusterFS API
application call
Yesterday, I looked into the core. From the core it looked like the rebalance
process crashed
during cleanup_and_exit. The frame seems to be corrupted. Therefore it does not
look like a snapshot
bug. The test case tests snapshot with tiered volume. If somebody from
rebalance or tiering team can
OK, I've repeated the same traversing test with patched GlusterFS API, and
here is new Valgrind log:
https://gist.github.com/17ecb16a11c9aed957f5
Still leaks.
On вівторок, 5 січня 2016 р. 22:52:25 EET Soumya Koduri wrote:
> On 01/05/2016 05:56 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > Unfortunately,
Hi all,
This meeting is scheduled for anyone that is interested in learning more
about, or assisting with the Bug Triage.
Meeting details:
- location: #gluster-meeting on Freenode IRC
(https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=gluster-meeting )
- date: every Tuesday
- time: 12:00 UTC
Rajesh - can you please help with this?
Thanks,
Vijay
On 01/04/2016 06:40 PM, Michael Adam wrote:
https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17291/console
- Forwarded message from "Gluster Build System (Code Review)"
-
Date: Mon, 4 Jan
Shyam wrote:
On 12/09/2015 12:47 AM, Aravinda wrote:
Hi,
Sharing draft design for GFID to Path Conversion.(Directory GFID to
Path is
very easy in DHT v.1, this design may not work in case of DHT 2.0)
(current thought) DHT2 would extend the manner in which name,pGFID is
stored for files,
Unfortunately, both patches didn't make any difference for me.
I've patched 3.7.6 with both patches, recompiled and installed patched
GlusterFS package on client side and mounted volume with ~2M of files.
The I performed usual tree traverse with simple "find".
Memory RES value went from
Hi,
Please find the minutes of the today's Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting.
Thanks a lot for attending the meeting.
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/gluster-meeting/2016-01-05/gluster_bug_triage.2016-01-05-12.00.html
Minutes (text):
22 matches
Mail list logo