[Gluster-devel] Python 3 is coming!

Python 3.5 is approved for Fedora 24[1], which is scheduled to ship in May[2] We have several places in the source where Python 2 is an explicit requirement. Do we want to rethink the hard requirement for Python 2? I suspect we should. [1]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/24/ChangeSet

Re: [Gluster-devel] NetBSD regression fixes

Hi all I have the followif changes awaiting code review/merge: http://review.gluster.org/13204 http://review.gluster.org/13205 http://review.gluster.org/13245 http://review.gluster.org/13247 -- Emmanuel Dreyfus m...@netbsd.org ___ Gluster-devel

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] GlusterFS FUSE client hangs on rsyncing lots of file

XFS. Server side works OK, I'm able to mount volume again. Brick is 30% full. On понеділок, 18 січня 2016 р. 15:07:18 EET baul jianguo wrote: > What is your brick file system? and the glusterfsd process and all > thread status? > I met same issue when client app such as rsync stay in D status,and

Re: [Gluster-devel] Core from gNFS process

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 2:25 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 01/15/2016 08:38 AM, Soumya Koduri wrote: > >> >> >> >> On 01/15/2016 06:52 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On 01/14/2016 08:41 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >>> On 01/14/2016 04:11 AM, Jiffin Tony Thottan

[Gluster-devel] rm -r problem on FreeBSD port

Hi, I have a simple gluster volume made up of 2 bricks using distribute (running on the FreeBSD port of 3.7.6). When I do a "rm -rf " for a fairly large tree, I sometimes get "Directory not empty" errors. When I look in the directory (even after an unmount, shutdown, restart, remount) the "ls -l"

Re: [Gluster-devel] rm -r problem on FreeBSD port

On 01/18/2016 06:18 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: Hi, I have a simple gluster volume made up of 2 bricks using distribute (running on the FreeBSD port of 3.7.6). When I do a "rm -rf " for a fairly large tree, I sometimes get "Directory not empty" errors. When I look in the directory (even after an

[Gluster-devel] ENOSPC on slave21.cloud.gluster.org ?

https://build.gluster.org/job/glusterfs-devrpms-el7/6734/console -- Error Summary - Disk Requirements: At least 104MB more space needed on the / filesystem. + exit 1 Build step 'Execute shell' marked build as failure

[Gluster-devel] Gluster Monthly Newsletter, January 2015 Edition

We're kicking off an updated Monthly Newsletter, coming out mid-month. We'll highlight special posts, news and noteworthy threads from the mailing lists, events, and other things that are important for the Gluster community. == Community Survey Followup ==

[Gluster-devel] How to cope with spurious regression failures

Hi Spurious regression failures make developers frustrated. One submits a change and gets completely unrelated failures. The only way out is to retrigger regression until it passes, a boring and time-wasting task. Sometimes after 4 or 5 failed runs, the submitter realize there is a real issue and

Re: [Gluster-devel] rm -r problem on FreeBSD port

- Original Message - > From: "Rick Macklem" > To: "Gluster Devel" > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 4:48:21 AM > Subject: [Gluster-devel] rm -r problem on FreeBSD port > > Hi, > > I have a simple gluster volume made up of 2 bricks

[Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

Hi Saravna, ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t seems to have failed a NetBSD run: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17651/consoleFull Not sure if it is spurious as it passed in the subsequent run. Please have a look. Thanks, Ravi

Re: [Gluster-devel] rm -r problem on FreeBSD port

Hi Rick, Could you get us some more information about your setup: 1) Are you parallely doing 'rm -r' from multiple mount points? Or are you doing 'ls' while rm was in progress? 2) Is the error just a one time occurrence or do you still see it when you try and remove the directory? 3) The

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

Ravishankar N wrote: Hi Saravna, ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t seems to have failed a NetBSD run: https://build.gluster.org/job/rackspace-regression-2GB-triggered/17651/consoleFull Not sure if it is spurious as it passed in the subsequent run. Please have a look. Might be too soon to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python 3 is coming!

Python 2 and 3 can co exists. If Python 3 used by default, then we may have to change the script heading from `#!/usr/bin/python` to `#!/usr/bin/env python2`. We need to modify the code where python command is used to call python script. For example, `PYTHON GSYNCD` to `PYTHON2 GSYNCD`

Re: [Gluster-devel] Python 3 is coming!

Hi, Changing our code to make use of Python's "six" module will help maintain code that will run both on Python 2 and Python 3. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/six Regards, -Prashanth Pai - Original Message - > From: "Aravinda" > To: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY"

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

Hi Ravi, I can run this locally, seems like spurious. Let me know if you see again. Please correct my email id, you are addressing another Saravana :) Thanks, Saravana On 01/19/2016 09:42 AM, Venky Shankar wrote: Ravishankar N wrote: Hi Saravna, ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t seems

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

On 01/19/2016 12:01 PM, Venky Shankar wrote: Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: Hi Ravi, I can run this locally, seems like spurious. Works fine on Linux for me too.Maybe its observed easily on BSD. Let me know if you see again. To be safe, it would benefit to have sleep(1) before the check.

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

Hi, Yes, I can easily add additional 2 second sleep. But, the problem here is: irrespective of anything(especially these timing changes), it should not create any additional changelog. It is a test volume created for test purpose where no I/O is carried out. So, we may end up putting band-aid

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD port of GlusterFS racks up a lot of CPU usage

- Original Message - > From: "Rick Macklem" > To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa" > Cc: "Jeff Darcy" , "Raghavendra G" > , "freebsd-fs" > , "Hubbard Jordan" ,

Re: [Gluster-devel] ./tests/bugs/changelog/bug-1208470.t failed NetBSD

Saravanakumar Arumugam wrote: Hi Ravi, I can run this locally, seems like spurious. Let me know if you see again. To be safe, it would benefit to have sleep(1) before the check. Please correct my email id, you are addressing another Saravana :) Thanks, Saravana On 01/19/2016 09:42 AM,

Re: [Gluster-devel] FreeBSD port of GlusterFS racks up a lot of CPU usage

Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Rick Macklem" > > To: "Jeff Darcy" > > Cc: "Raghavendra G" , "freebsd-fs" > > , "Hubbard Jordan" > > , "Xavier