On 02/04/2016 03:39 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
I'm okay with this.
+1
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
Hi,
We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following
triggers.
1. Verified+1
2. Code-review+2
3. recheck
- Original Message -
> From: "Prashanth Pai"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Vijay Bellur" , "Gluster Devel"
> , "Thiago da Silva"
>
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 3:53:22
I'm okay with this.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following
> triggers.
>
> 1. Verified+1
> 2. Code-review+2
> 3. recheck (netbsd|centos|smoke)
>
> There is a bug in 1 and 2.
>
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:34:05PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following
> triggers.
>
> 1. Verified+1
> 2. Code-review+2
> 3. recheck (netbsd|centos|smoke)
>
> There is a bug in 1 and 2.
>
> Multiple triggers of 1 or
Hi,
We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following
triggers.
1. Verified+1
2. Code-review+2
3. recheck (netbsd|centos|smoke)
There is a bug in 1 and 2.
Multiple triggers of 1 or 2 would result in re-runs even when not intended.
I would like to replace 1 and 2 with a
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:34:04AM +0530, Shyam wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 09:38 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:
> >On 02/03/2016 11:34 AM, Venky Shankar wrote:
> >>On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 09:24:06AM -0500, Jeff Darcy wrote:
> Problem is with workloads which know the files that need to be read
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> To: "Vijay Bellur"
> Cc: "Gluster Devel"
> Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2016 6:58:29 AM
> Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Non-blocking lock for renames
>
>
>
>
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:05 +0530, Anoop C S wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 18:59 +0530, PankaJ Singh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks Anoop for the help,
> > Would you please tell me when can we expect this new release with
> > this bug fix.
> >
>
> Please find the corresponding patch posted
> Even with compound fops It will still require two sequential network
> operations from dht2. One to MDC and one to DC So I don't think it helps.
There are still two hops, but making it a compound op keeps the
server-to-server communication in the compounding translator (which
should already be
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:34:05PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the following
> > triggers.
> >
> > 1. Verified+1
> > 2. Code-review+2
> > 3.
Kaleb Keithley wrote on 04/02/2016 06:40:
>
> If you're a Debian Wheezy user please give the new packages a try.
Thanks for this Kaleb, I'll give it a try in the next few days.
I realise this is a newbie question but, just for my sanity, what's the best
procedure to upgrade my two nodes?
On 02/04/2016 07:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:17:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
Hi Sahina,
The gluster-nagios project currently lives in the 3 repositories in
review.gluster.org. Finding these projects on gerrit is not easy.
To be more visible it would be better if it
On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 11:57:14AM +0530, Sahina Bose wrote:
>
>
> On 02/04/2016 07:36 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:17:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> >>Hi Sahina,
> >>
> >>The gluster-nagios project currently lives in the 3 repositories in
> >>review.gluster.org. Finding
Interesting. I just encountered a hanging flush problem, too. Probably
unrelated but if you want to give this a try a temporary workaround I found was
to drop caches, "echo 3 > /proc/vm/drop_caches", on all the servers prior to
the flush operation.
On February 4, 2016 10:06:45 PM PST,
Le jeudi 04 février 2016 à 19:20 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> Michael,
> Do you have an update on the SSL cert situation for review.gluster.org?
> We've been in this state for nearly 5 months now.
so I did update the cert today, so it should be good now.
--
Michael Scherer
Sysadmin, Community
I'm still up to mentor the sub-directory mount support idea.
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
> Hi all,
> Google Summer of Code opens up their organization application on Feb 8th,
> and I wanted to reach out and check to see if there is interest within the
>
Pranith Kumar Karampuri writes:
> On 02/03/2016 07:54 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
>>> Problem is with workloads which know the files that need to be read
>>> without readdir, like hyperlinks (webserver), swift objects etc. These
>>> are two I know of which will have this problem,
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 07:17:25PM +0530, Kaushal M wrote:
> Hi Sahina,
>
> The gluster-nagios project currently lives in the 3 repositories in
> review.gluster.org. Finding these projects on gerrit is not easy.
>
> To be more visible it would be better if it is added to github under
> the
Michael,
Do you have an update on the SSL cert situation for review.gluster.org?
We've been in this state for nearly 5 months now.
~kaushal
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Glomski, Patrick
wrote:
> FYI,
>
> The wildcard certificate for *.gluster.org used by
On 02/04/2016 08:48 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
I'm still up to mentor the sub-directory mount support idea.
this one? http://review.gluster.org/10186
Pranith
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Amye Scavarda wrote:
Hi all,
Google Summer of Code opens up their organization
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:15:16PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 4:13 PM, Niels de Vos wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 03:34:05PM +0530, Raghavendra Talur wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > We recently changed the jenkins builds to be triggered on the
Le jeudi 04 février 2016 à 19:20 +0530, Kaushal M a écrit :
> Michael,
> Do you have an update on the SSL cert situation for review.gluster.org?
> We've been in this state for nearly 5 months now.
I tought I did upgrade the ssl cert, but seems it fall out of the TODO
list. I will look like later
On 02/04/2016 12:58 AM, Raghavendra Gowdappa wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Vijay Bellur"
To: "Shyamsundar Ranganathan" , "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
Cc: "Gluster Devel"
Sent: Thursday,
- Original Message -
> From: "Vijay Bellur"
> To: "Raghavendra Gowdappa"
> Cc: "Shyamsundar Ranganathan" , "Gluster Devel"
>
> Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 10:06:07 AM
> Subject: Re:
+soumyak, +rtalur.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 2:34 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri <
pkara...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 01/28/2016 05:05 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
>> With baul jianguo's help I am able to see that FLUSH fops are hanging for
>> some reason.
>>
>> pk1@localhost - ~/Downloads
On 02/04/2016 10:35 AM, Kaushal M wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
On 02/04/2016 08:48 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
I'm still up to mentor the sub-directory mount support idea.
this one? http://review.gluster.org/10186
This seems to
Hi all,
Google Summer of Code opens up their organization application on Feb 8th,
and I wanted to reach out and check to see if there is interest within the
Gluster community to participate this year.
We'd need to have an application in place by Feb 19th, with a list of
possible ideas, as well as
FYI,
The wildcard certificate for *.gluster.org used by review.gluster.org
expired on 2015/09/25. I figure if one goes through the trouble of
configuring SSL on the site, one may as well keep the certs valid...
Patrick
==
Certificate:
Data:
Version: 3
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Pranith Kumar Karampuri
wrote:
>
>
> On 02/04/2016 08:48 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
>>
>> I'm still up to mentor the sub-directory mount support idea.
>
> this one? http://review.gluster.org/10186
This seems to have been revived. IIRC, Avati's
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:51:59PM +0530, Pranith Kumar Karampuri wrote:
>
>
> On 02/04/2016 08:48 PM, Kaushal M wrote:
> >I'm still up to mentor the sub-directory mount support idea.
> this one? http://review.gluster.org/10186
How about a project to write a fuse client based on libgfapi and
On 02/03/2016 07:54 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote:
Problem is with workloads which know the files that need to be read
without readdir, like hyperlinks (webserver), swift objects etc. These
are two I know of which will have this problem, which can't be improved
because we don't have metadata, data
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Soumya Koduri wrote:
>
>
> On 02/01/2016 01:39 PM, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
>
>> Wait. It seems to be my bad.
>>
>> Before unmounting I do drop_caches (2), and glusterfs process CPU usage
>> goes to 100% for a while. I haven't waited for it
32 matches
Mail list logo