Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Update on GlusterFS-3.7.10

2016-04-12 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 13 April 2016 at 13:57, Atin Mukherjee wrote: > Yes, we have a patch which is awaiting regression to pass. Post that > Kaushal should be able to tag 3.7.11. Thanks for your patience :) No worries, thanks, it'l be ready when its ready. -- Lindsay

Re: [Gluster-devel] conflicting keys for option eager-lock

2016-04-12 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 04/12/2016 11:53 PM, Atin Mukherjee wrote: On 04/13/2016 09:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hey Pranith, Ashish - We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in release-3.7: commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Update on GlusterFS-3.7.10

2016-04-12 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 04/13/2016 08:40 AM, Lindsay Mathieson wrote: > On 7 April 2016 at 15:42, Kaushal M wrote: >> This regression was decided as a blocker, and a decision was made to >> do a quick GlusterFS-3.7.11 release solving it. The 3.7.11 release >> should be available in within the

Re: [Gluster-devel] conflicting keys for option eager-lock

2016-04-12 Thread Atin Mukherjee
On 04/13/2016 09:15 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote: > On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: >> Hey Pranith, Ashish - >> >> We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in >> release-3.7: >> >> commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66 >> Author: Ashish Pandey

Re: [Gluster-devel] conflicting keys for option eager-lock

2016-04-12 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 04/08/2016 10:25 PM, Vijay Bellur wrote: Hey Pranith, Ashish - We have broken support for group virt after the following commit in release-3.7: commit 46920e3bd38d9ae7c1910d0bd83eff309ab20c66 Author: Ashish Pandey Date: Fri Mar 4 13:05:09 2016 +0530 cluster/ec:

Re: [Gluster-devel] [Gluster-users] Update on GlusterFS-3.7.10

2016-04-12 Thread Lindsay Mathieson
On 7 April 2016 at 15:42, Kaushal M wrote: > This regression was decided as a blocker, and a decision was made to > do a quick GlusterFS-3.7.11 release solving it. The 3.7.11 release > should be available in within the next 2 days. Is this still happening? -- Lindsay

[Gluster-devel] RFC: beginning to phase out legacy Gluster NFS, to be eventually replaces with NFS-Ganesha

2016-04-12 Thread Kaleb Keithley
Hi, Some of you may have noticed that one of the roadmap items for GlusterFS 3.8 is to change the default for the volume option nfs.disable from 'off' to 'on'. If you haven't noticed, then this email will serve to call your attention to it. Changing the nfs.disable volume option from 'off' to

Re: [Gluster-devel] Design doc for SELinux client support in GlusterFS

2016-04-12 Thread Vijay Bellur
On 04/12/2016 06:40 AM, Manikandan Selvaganesh wrote: Hi all, As discussed in the mails[1] we are implementing SELinux translator for GlusterFS. We have a design doc[2] about the "SELinux Client Support in GlusterFS". Comments and suggestions are highly appreciated. [1]

[Gluster-devel] Minutes from todays Gluster Community Bug Triage meeting (2016-04-12)

2016-04-12 Thread Mohammed Rafi K C
Hi all, thanks for the participation today. In case you have missed the meeting, remind yourself to join next week Wednesday at 12:00 UTC. More details in the agenda: https://public.pad.fsfe.org/p/gluster-community-meetings #gluster-meeting:

Re: [Gluster-devel] Test-case "./tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t" hung

2016-04-12 Thread Pranith Kumar Karampuri
On 04/12/2016 05:54 PM, Jeff Darcy wrote: tier can lead to parallel lookups in two different epoll threads on hot/cold tiers. The race-window to hit the common-dictionary in lookup use-after-free is too low without dict_copy_with_ref() in either ec/afr. In either afr/ec side one thread should

Re: [Gluster-devel] Posix lock migration design

2016-04-12 Thread Susant Palai
Hi all, The feature page for lock migration can be found here: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs-specs/blob/master/accepted/Lock-Migration.md. Please give your feedback on this mail thread it self or on gerrit (http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13924/). Thanks, Susant - Original Message

Re: [Gluster-devel] Test-case "./tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t" hung

2016-04-12 Thread Jeff Darcy
> tier can lead to parallel lookups in two different epoll threads on > hot/cold tiers. The race-window to hit the common-dictionary in lookup > use-after-free is too low without dict_copy_with_ref() in either ec/afr. > In either afr/ec side one thread should be executing dict_serialization > in

Re: [Gluster-devel] Test-case "./tests/basic/tier/tier-file-create.t" hung

2016-04-12 Thread Jeff Darcy
> This is a memory corruption issue which is already reported and there is a > patch by Pranith in 3.7 [1] waiting to get reviews. Patch [1] will solve the > issue . > [1] : http://review.gluster.org/#/c/13574/ That patch seems to be about making and modifying a copy of xattr_req, instead of

Re: [Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature: 07-04-2016

2016-04-12 Thread Karthik Subrahmanya
- Original Message - > From: "Niels de Vos" > To: "Karthik Subrahmanya" > Cc: "gluster-devel" > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2016 2:00:57 PM > Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] WORM/Retention Feature: 07-04-2016 > > On Thu,